JonB":122bt1ui said:If I've read it right, Chris's commentary on the proposals seems to suggest that membership of the new board may be used to bring in new money - have I got that right?
If I have, it's not something I was anticipating (& I mean that as a neutral observation!).
knecht":3aceyfjj said:Might this "My guess is that all constituencies will bring loyalty and commitment to Argyle, but some might bring other things as well (e.g. money to buy season-tickets, money to invest in the club, etc.)." be where JonB gets the suggestion that the GASB members may actually bring extra money to the table?
PL2 3DQ":invm7hio said:The original plan was to have a representative from the Green Taverners, The Trust and the various supporters groups plus four independent fans. Unless I've read it wrong, the emphasis is now on the groups rather than the independents?
An exciting and unchartered time for PAFC and football.
dunlop":2io7zwfr said:Maybe it is me being cynical, but it doesn't seem as straightforward as it was first announced.
tonycholwell":2yv4xp4i said:dunlop":2yv4xp4i said:Maybe it is me being cynical, but it doesn't seem as straightforward as it was first announced.
Haha very true Mike.
Still, we may be jumping the gun, we all need to see how this pans out first. Although by having only 15 people at the meeting and it starting at noon one wonders if it will be abale to be inclusive and allow enough time.
Derrick Sanderson":3jpq58ie said:tonycholwell":3jpq58ie said:dunlop":3jpq58ie said:Maybe it is me being cynical, but it doesn't seem as straightforward as it was first announced.
Haha very true Mike.
Still, we may be jumping the gun, we all need to see how this pans out first. Although by having only 15 people at the meeting and it starting at noon one wonders if it will be abale to be inclusive and allow enough time.
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: Hold the front page.
Pasoti poster admits he MAY be getting his shreddies in a twist...without knowing all the facts first.
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
:lol:
tonycholwell":4b4su737 said:Derrick Sanderson":4b4su737 said:tonycholwell":4b4su737 said:dunlop":4b4su737 said:Maybe it is me being cynical, but it doesn't seem as straightforward as it was first announced.
Haha very true Mike.
Still, we may be jumping the gun, we all need to see how this pans out first. Although by having only 15 people at the meeting and it starting at noon one wonders if it will be abale to be inclusive and allow enough time.
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: Hold the front page.
Pasoti poster admits he MAY be getting his shreddies in a twist...without knowing all the facts first.
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
:lol:
Thats a marvellous example of smlie art, I must say.
I hate to disappoint, but if you read the OS post David Wheeeler cleare it isnt even though I think it was meant to be. I remain, as always, calm.