Why at 1-0 down, with Tyler Harvey on the bench, would you take off Brunt ( who had a poor game) and replace with him a low on confidence Right Back? Sheridan's stubborn side showing again? :facepalm: :crazy:
-
Welcome to PASOTI. Sponsored by Lang & Potter
Mellor at CF (Instead of Harvey)
- Thread starter LeonTheGreen
- Start date
What - prolific Goalscorer Tyler Harvey? A forward you could knock down with a feather playing against an organised, physical back four?
Would you rather a low on Confidence RIGHT BACK!!! Or someone who is actually very forward thinking?
C
Cobi Budge.
Guest
What a kick in the teeth for Harvey that must have been.
Truly bizzare decision. A chance fell to Mellor when we were 1 0 down and he just got his feet muddled up, if it had fallen to a striker I doubt it would have happened.
Truly bizzare decision. A chance fell to Mellor when we were 1 0 down and he just got his feet muddled up, if it had fallen to a striker I doubt it would have happened.
I agree.crownhillpilgrim":29qb5c2g said:
Bringing on a right-back who's scored 0 goals in 25 games was so much of a better decision than bringing on a striker who's scored 4 in 10 starts.
Right-back and striker, they're pretty much the same position anyway, aren't they?
C
Cobi Budge.
Guest
crownhillpilgrim":10dpuw2j said:
Mellor isn't exactly a prolific goalscorer.
The substitution made no sense whatsoever, a poachers chance fell to Mellor at 1 0 and he just got his feet muddled, get the feeling Harvey would have taken it, and I'm not usually a big fan.
I thought the substitution made sense. Bring Mellor on for Brunt, play Mellor RWB, and push Talbot up-front with Lewi.
But no, Mellor went straight up-front for, I assume, his height advantage over Talbot, despite never having had ANY lucky whatsoever playing hoof-ball under JS.
Bemused.
But no, Mellor went straight up-front for, I assume, his height advantage over Talbot, despite never having had ANY lucky whatsoever playing hoof-ball under JS.
Bemused.
Absolutely bizarre , Allesandra had a stinker today as did Reid and both stayed on the pitch . Carl McHugh was man of the match , in my view , and was taken off. Very defeatist attitude from our manager.
Jason Banton used to bang in the goals when he was played as a striker so why did he persist with sticking him on the left wing where we all know he's ineffective. Put Banton up front with Lewis or brunt, then I would suggest bringing on a winger who can beat a man and whip in a decent cross but we threw one of them away to Motherwell for next to nothing.....
Pottypilgrim":r36rv5bb said:
Banton upfront, Harvey midfield, Talbot pushed forward on the flank.
Maybe Norburn midfield so a couple of passes might be completed? :facepalm:
Talbot upfront and mellor on the right.
If this throw of the dice worked it would be genius !! Harvey would have made no impression against the large and impressive bury defence and center miss. eththu man of the match easily. Right choices today, didn't come off. Lost to a better team
If this throw of the dice worked it would be genius !! Harvey would have made no impression against the large and impressive bury defence and center miss. eththu man of the match easily. Right choices today, didn't come off. Lost to a better team
Also shows the importance of reid to the team, bury would have grown an inch and gained some speed on hearing he wasn't starting.
On and off the ball scoring or not, he is Integal to us staying near the top
On and off the ball scoring or not, he is Integal to us staying near the top