Just a thought that occurred to me but what do the other clubs in the SWPL think about Argyle having a team in their league? Isn't it a little similar to the whole 'B-team' debate? For the record I am completely against the 'B-teams', but was just curious about how this was different.
-
Welcome to PASOTI. Sponsored by Lang & Potter
Argyle Reserves
- Thread starter Somerset_Pilgrim
- Start date
So how high do you have to go up the football pyramid before having a reserved side would be unacceptable? North/South Conference? I'm sure extra gate receipts was a reason for the big clubs saying it would be a good thing with the B-teams argument.
The difference is that the SWL decided, on a democratic vote, that the pros outweighed the cons. It seems likely that the EFL clubs will vote against with a democratic vote.
No idea, but I'm sure St Austell will appreciate the income from the extra people at the game tomorrow.
How is that different from saying we would appreciate the income from the extra people watching Man United reserves in a League Two fixture?
I think the integrity of the football pyramid would be best served by reserve teams playing in reserve leagues at all levels beyond local football.
How is that different from saying we would appreciate the income from the extra people watching Man United reserves in a League Two fixture?
I think the integrity of the football pyramid would be best served by reserve teams playing in reserve leagues at all levels beyond local football.
Interestingly there is an article in this months fourfourtwo about this very issue. Obviously can't do a link as its in old fashioned print but it raised some valid points. Does smack of double standards a little.