Man city emergancy loan plea granted | PASOTI
  • Welcome to PASOTI. Sponsored by Lang & Potter

Man city emergancy loan plea granted

A

argyledj

Guest
disgusting if its granted, one rule for the big clubs again whats the point in having deadline days.
 
Lundan Cabbie

Lundan Cabbie

⚪️ Pasoti Visitor ⚪️
Sep 3, 2008
4,543
1,435
Plymouth
argyledj":dntjxxvw said:
disgusting if its granted, one rule for the big clubs again whats the point in having deadline days.
Click to expand...

The emergency loan window doesn't include goalkeepers.

Didn't Argyle use this rule to bring in Rab Douglas for one game instead of using a youth keeper? Hardly one rule for the big clubs and another for the rest.
 
A

argyledj

Guest
Lundan Cabbie":43vjijdl said:
argyledj":43vjijdl said:
disgusting if its granted, one rule for the big clubs again whats the point in having deadline days.
Click to expand...

The emergency loan window doesn't include goalkeepers.

Didn't Argyle use this rule to bring in Rab Douglas for one game instead of using a youth keeper? Hardly one rule for the big clubs and another for the rest.
Click to expand...

as stated above they have a fit goalkeeper avaliable and another of there goalkeepers is returning to training.
 
Whelan11

Whelan11

Feb 14, 2007
350
136
Taunton
argyledj":xe2ko2si said:
Lundan Cabbie":xe2ko2si said:
argyledj":xe2ko2si said:
disgusting if its granted, one rule for the big clubs again whats the point in having deadline days.
Click to expand...

The emergency loan window doesn't include goalkeepers.

Didn't Argyle use this rule to bring in Rab Douglas for one game instead of using a youth keeper? Hardly one rule for the big clubs and another for the rest.
Click to expand...

as stated above they have a fit goalkeeper avaliable and another of there goalkeepers is returning to training.
Click to expand...

Couldn't we have used Lloyd Saxton though?
 
M

MylesPAFC

Guest
Fair enough, he is there player why shouldn't he be allowed to return ? It's not an emergency loan either, it is called recalling your own player, how can you loan a player that is already contracted to your club? Birmingham will let him go back aswell, as they have pretty much agreed that Hart can return there again on loan next season. If they didn't let him I doubt that City would allow him to go back there.
 
Tavypilgrim

Tavypilgrim

Jan 31, 2005
1,829
0
Tavistock
Whelan11":3moambph said:
argyledj":3moambph said:
Lundan Cabbie":3moambph said:
argyledj":3moambph said:
disgusting if its granted, one rule for the big clubs again whats the point in having deadline days.
Click to expand...

The emergency loan window doesn't include goalkeepers.

Didn't Argyle use this rule to bring in Rab Douglas for one game instead of using a youth keeper? Hardly one rule for the big clubs and another for the rest.
Click to expand...

as stated above they have a fit goalkeeper avaliable and another of there goalkeepers is returning to training.
Click to expand...

Couldn't we have used Lloyd Saxton though?
Click to expand...

According to GOS he wasn't on the bench. Maybe he was injured?
 
GreenMatt

GreenMatt

Jul 23, 2008
907
0
St.Austell
MylesPAFC":tv39xiyf said:
Fair enough, he is there player why shouldn't he be allowed to return ? It's not an emergency loan either, it is called recalling your own player, how can you loan a player that is already contracted to your club? Birmingham will let him go back aswell, as they have pretty much agreed that Hart can return there again on loan next season. If they didn't let him I doubt that City would allow him to go back there.
Click to expand...
The BBC have used the same link for a different story. Yeaterday it had said they'd applied to bring in a new goalkeeper as 1 was out on loan and another 2 injured.
 
M

MylesPAFC

Guest
greenmatbor3":3px16w81 said:
MylesPAFC":3px16w81 said:
Fair enough, he is there player why shouldn't he be allowed to return ? It's not an emergency loan either, it is called recalling your own player, how can you loan a player that is already contracted to your club? Birmingham will let him go back aswell, as they have pretty much agreed that Hart can return there again on loan next season. If they didn't let him I doubt that City would allow him to go back there.
Click to expand...
The BBC have used the same link for a different story. Yeaterday it had said they'd applied to bring in a new goalkeeper as 1 was out on loan and another 2 injured.
Click to expand...

Oh right, yeah that is wrong then. Was wondering why everyone was so unimpressed about it all, but makes sense now.
 
Whelan11

Whelan11

Feb 14, 2007
350
136
Taunton
Tavypilgrim":2hsveoxl said:
Whelan11":2hsveoxl said:
argyledj":2hsveoxl said:
Lundan Cabbie":2hsveoxl said:
argyledj":2hsveoxl said:
disgusting if its granted, one rule for the big clubs again whats the point in having deadline days.
Click to expand...

The emergency loan window doesn't include goalkeepers.

Didn't Argyle use this rule to bring in Rab Douglas for one game instead of using a youth keeper? Hardly one rule for the big clubs and another for the rest.
Click to expand...

as stated above they have a fit goalkeeper avaliable and another of there goalkeepers is returning to training.
Click to expand...

Couldn't we have used Lloyd Saxton though?
Click to expand...

According to GOS he wasn't on the bench. Maybe he was injured?
Click to expand...

At the time i seem to remember people saying whether we should give Lloyd a go or bring in a loanee, of course most preferred the latter. So i'm pretty sure he was fit. Sturrock never used to name a sub goalie when it was only 5 subs if i remember correctly?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Man City have been turned down because they didn't insert a recall clause in the loan deal when Hart moved to Birmingham. :lol:
 
F

Frazer Lloyd-Davies

Guest
I don't understand the outrage. As said, we did it to sign Douglas and people didn't complain then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom