Having followed the link and started reading the first couple of lines, this jumped out at me.
"The Companies Court is a part of the Chancery Division."
Best place for this bunch of chancers then really.
penzancepirate wrote:PL2 3DQ wrote: It could be that one of the Director's have brought this to court in an effort to stop the other Director's making a decision later in the day?
That would make sense ... I wonder who is ultimately footing the bill for these expensive legal manoueverings ... wonder if legal people on all sides are paid up front over and before the Argyle staff.... probably. Plenty of money for their legal concubines and fellow feeders.
Waraqah wrote: This isn't Inscapes, is it?
Waraqah wrote: This isn't Inscapes, is it?
Marcus The Green wrote:Waraqah wrote: This isn't Inscapes, is it?
Inscapes are starting out of court proceedings. It won't be them.
Kevin_Gollop wrote: Well Synan and Todd were meeting in London weren't they? Just when you thought this couldn't get any more shambolic!
Graham Clark wrote: We have been furiously been trying to find out more about this. Apparently, the case will not be in open court which implies it may be some form of injunction. Celia Ellacott of the ISC has agreed to be there in any case. This may have implications for the timing of tomorrow's Board Meeting
PAFC+ wrote:Kevin_Gollop wrote: Well Synan and Todd were meeting in London weren't they? Just when you thought this couldn't get any more shambolic!
Hamish Marshall said on Spotlight that Synan had called him this morning from Japan
PAFC+ wrote:Kevin_Gollop wrote: Well Synan and Todd were meeting in London weren't they? Just when you thought this couldn't get any more shambolic!
Hamish Marshall said on Spotlight that Synan had called him this morning from Japan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group