
Repeat post deleted.
Norwich Green wrote: James Brent is obviously no mug and he has connections with the region & the city. It may be that he will have property interests, but Argyle may have to develop the ground/infrastructure to survive. Norwich have numerous restaurants/bars and a hotel at the ground and it seems to work perfectly well. But what we all want is somebody to put the team first and foremost before the re-development of Home Park. I guess the jury is out on whether that will happen.
green_for_life wrote: I think we all have to accept property development will be the only attraction to our club. We're too far in debt for football alone. If we can accept this then we can try our best to work with the property developers (James Brent or whoever), transparency is key. So long as the property developer (James Brent or whoever) doesn't fleece the club out of its earnings, we shouldn't be any worse off than the board who took over from MaCauley?
Greenskin wrote:green_for_life wrote: I think we all have to accept property development will be the only attraction to our club. We're too far in debt for football alone. If we can accept this then we can try our best to work with the property developers (James Brent or whoever), transparency is key. So long as the property developer (James Brent or whoever) doesn't fleece the club out of its earnings, we shouldn't be any worse off than the board who took over from MaCauley?
But we won't be that far in debt under a CVA,will we?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group