One of the departed Directors had to take Kagami to court to get his money-didn't this raise any alarm bells with Stapleton?
If you believe what Stapleton says, it shows he's not fit to run a market stall let alone a professional footbal club.
SCH wrote: The man was never as bad as some painted him.
MarkinMelbourne wrote:pilgrim_pete wrote: Well done to Postey..
Reading that, I can't help just feeling an inkling of remorse for the guy. I know it's only one side of the story, but I don't see any of the others giving an interview.
Here, here! Can we strip Fail of his knighthood and re-distribute it to Sir Ian De Lar, sounds more appropriate!
I had that inkling of remorse for mullet until I started wondering if he was getting paid for the interview!
Greenskin wrote: So,if Todd,Gardner,Kagami et al make a public apology,they will be forgiven too?
Chancellor wrote: Its hardly an apology though is it. The reporter has said it is an apology but all Stapleton has said is "I'm sorry it has turned out like this".
Its a bit like a mass murderer saying its a shame that the people he killed are'nt alive still.
And I note Mr Stapleton is still pointing the finger at all and sundry and denying knowing the full scale of the mess despite being contracted to be paid £50k a year to look after things like that.
Stapleton admits in the article he knew there was no cash in March 2009 so they couldnt sack Sturrock. So how can he claim he didnt understand the gravity of the situation after that date? Its also rather illuminating that he refuses to blame the Japanese connection yet in the same article is pointing the finger at Synan for not keeping Kagami informed.
Its all very confusing as to why the man is doing this now.
IJN wrote:MarkinMelbourne wrote:pilgrim_pete wrote: Well done to Postey..
Reading that, I can't help just feeling an inkling of remorse for the guy. I know it's only one side of the story, but I don't see any of the others giving an interview.
Here, here! Can we strip Fail of his knighthood and re-distribute it to Sir Ian De Lar, sounds more appropriate!
I had that inkling of remorse for mullet until I started wondering if he was getting paid for the interview!
Mark, he most definitely wasn't according to those that know these things (Rupert, for one).
By the way, your shirt was posted to London yesterday.
If you want to bung another fiver in the GT fund, that will cover it.
Enjoy.
SCH wrote:
The man was never as bad as some painted him.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group