PASOTI
  • Fantasy Football
  • Predictions
  • Club Info
  • About Us
  • FAQ

Skip to content

Twitter @pasoti1
General The Story So Far
A chronicle of 2011-2012 using classic, popular and important threads from Pasoti. Court winding-up petitions, administration, Preferred Bidder, Fundraising, Chris Webb, Q&A with James Brent - it's all here.
125 posts Page 6 of 10
Topic locked
Previous 1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Next

Re: Argyle takeover depends on separate property deal!

User avatar

Posts: 350
Joined: 11:31 21 Jun 2006
Location: Norwich or Barnstaple
by Norwich Green
» 12:52 01 Aug 2011


marin(er) wrote: Any amount of digging and assumption making is not going to change anything. Whatever way the deal is being funded it is enough to satisfy BG and despite all the hatred and wild accusations aimed at him and Heaney and Ridsdale all we really knows that we have a pb that is progressing toward completing a deal.
Give yourselves a break and get behind the team for saturday



Right behind the team I have followed for 35 years mate, just not the sham of a deal that is threatening the future of MY football club...

Re: Argyle takeover depends on separate property deal!

User avatar

Posts: 11984
Joined: 10:17 29 Jul 2010
by X Isle
» 13:03 01 Aug 2011


marin(er) wrote: Any amount of digging and assumption making is not going to change anything. Whatever way the deal is being funded it is enough to satisfy BG and despite all the hatred and wild accusations aimed at him and Heaney and Ridsdale all we really knows that we have a pb that is progressing toward completing a deal.
Give yourselves a break and get behind the team for saturday


I know it illegal but you really do have to admire LSD for it's ability to transport the human mind to places where complete and unswerving faith in a false reality can be achieved.

Peace out :crazy:.

Re: Argyle takeover depends on separate property deal!

avatar

Posts: 642
Joined: 14:29 11 Nov 2006
by PAFC+
» 13:05 01 Aug 2011


Norwich Green wrote:
marin(er) wrote: Any amount of digging and assumption making is not going to change anything. Whatever way the deal is being funded it is enough to satisfy BG and despite all the hatred and wild accusations aimed at him and Heaney and Ridsdale all we really knows that we have a pb that is progressing toward completing a deal.
Give yourselves a break and get behind the team for saturday



Right behind the team I have followed for 35 years mate, just not the sham of a deal that is threatening the future of MY football club...


Likewise Norwich Green. I'll be at Shrewsbury cheering on the team. But Heaney and the Leeds mafia .... that's another thing altogether. They can go to hell. They're making a mockery of our club and every one of us. It's just a few 'head in the sand' people who can't see it, marin(er) being one of them.

Re: Argyle takeover depends on separate property deal!

avatar

Posts: 114
Joined: 09:47 05 Jan 2011
Location: Guildford
by LSGreen
» 13:06 01 Aug 2011


[quote="Hattrick13"]Heaney definitely doesnt have the money, i heard that he was due to get some funds in by the 30th June but dont think that happened.
[quote]

So you definitely don't think it happened? :banghead:

I hope you heard that off something who you think is definitely trustworthy!

Re: Argyle takeover depends on separate property deal!

User avatar

Posts: 2688
Joined: 07:41 07 Dec 2006
by FordGreen
» 13:09 01 Aug 2011


TimHarris wrote:
Norwich Green wrote:
FordGreen wrote: BTW, still not a peep from esmer, marin(er) and grovehill. :whistle:


No, thats odd isnt it as they are are usually on straight away coming to the defence of the PB's, PR's & BG's etc aren't they :whistle:


I believe that at least one of them might be on a family holiday.


It'll be very interesting to see if esmer posts at all this week. :whistle: ;)

Re: Argyle takeover depends on separate property deal!

User avatar

Posts: 1676
Joined: 17:52 23 Feb 2008
Location: Southampton
by Tim Chown
» 13:13 01 Aug 2011


Graham Clark wrote:
"We continue to look him in the eye and we continue to ask him whether he'll complete"


Is that an admission by Brenda that Heaney *is* the PB, and that BIL is just a front?

As others have said, it puts a huge question mark over the original proof of funding, unless of course that came from a different source (Abe?) and Heaney is now already on his own Plan B scrabbling to turn assets into cash.

If so, more ammo for the FL, and to get the tyre kicker out of the way so Brent can step forward.

Could the Trust publicly challenge the Administrator to show the PB currently has proof of funding, and if he can't do so within 48 hours to step aside, given the season starts in 5 days?

Re: Argyle takeover depends on separate property deal!

User avatar

Posts: 11984
Joined: 10:17 29 Jul 2010
by X Isle
» 13:15 01 Aug 2011


LSGreen wrote:
Hattrick13 wrote: Heaney definitely doesnt have the money, i heard that he was due to get some funds in by the 30th June but dont think that happened.

So you definitely don't think it happened? :banghead:

I hope you heard that off something who you think is definitely trustworthy!


Semantics LS, he's talking about Abe and that's pretty much open knowledge now as you well know. When up against a wall don't address the issue, pick at the words used, that's the first law of a weak debating position.

I have a question for you though. What, with every lapsed payment, weasle excuse and slipped deadline, is giving you the blind faith that this deal WILL happen?.

Genuinely interested to know because it flies in the face of observable developments.

Re: Argyle takeover depends on separate property deal!

User avatar

Posts: 508
Joined: 20:31 02 Sep 2008
by marin(er)
» 13:18 01 Aug 2011


X Isle wrote:
marin(er) wrote: Any amount of digging and assumption making is not going to change anything. Whatever way the deal is being funded it is enough to satisfy BG and despite all the hatred and wild accusations aimed at him and Heaney and Ridsdale all we really knows that we have a pb that is progressing toward completing a deal.
Give yourselves a break and get behind the team for saturday


I know it illegal but you really do have to admire LSD for it's ability to transport the human mind to places where complete and unswerving faith in a false reality can be achieved.

Peace out :crazy:.


I really do take offence to that remark. I can see why you made it though. Not a lot else you can do apart from throw insults. I have found your relentless, selfish ranting really offensive throughout and would suggest that if you don't have anything new to say then shut it rather than throw insults like a girl
Home Park is a fortress! (from today)

Re: Argyle takeover depends on separate property deal!

User avatar

Posts: 1946
Joined: 12:34 12 Jul 2011
Location: Mountwise Plymouth
by Glynn
» 13:21 01 Aug 2011


LSGreen wrote:
Hattrick13 wrote: Heaney definitely doesnt have the money, i heard that he was due to get some funds in by the 30th June but dont think that happened.

So you definitely don't think it happened? :banghead:

I hope you heard that off something who you think is definitely trustworthy!


Well apparently the situation is the same as it was then but to be honest who really knows the honest truth apart from the persons themselves. If all the people we hear stuff from knew this kind of info why dont they go down official channels etc.

Would ring true with all the other details in this thread about a property deal not going through and being delayed which was going to fund the Argyle deal. All we can do at this moment in time is speculate and go off rumours of others until such time that an official announcement is made etc. The thing that confuses me is that if Heaney has other forms of funds that he can use as this proposed property sale hasnt gone through why doesnt he do so. Surely it makes sense to get the deal sorted so that everyone can get on with things etc, he can then take all the time he wants to complete his own property sale.

Think everyone still needs to turn up to games and buy tickets though as its only the staff, public and players that lose out and not these fats cats behind the scenes if people dont back the club.

Re: Argyle takeover depends on separate property deal!

User avatar

Posts: 44
Joined: 13:44 13 Jun 2005
Location: worthing, west sussex
by greenarmy29
» 13:28 01 Aug 2011


marin(er) wrote:
X Isle wrote:
marin(er) wrote: Any amount of digging and assumption making is not going to change anything. Whatever way the deal is being funded it is enough to satisfy BG and despite all the hatred and wild accusations aimed at him and Heaney and Ridsdale all we really knows that we have a pb that is progressing toward completing a deal.
Give yourselves a break and get behind the team for saturday


I know it illegal but you really do have to admire LSD for it's ability to transport the human mind to places where complete and unswerving faith in a false reality can be achieved.

Peace out :crazy:.


I really do take offence to that remark. I can see why you made it though. Not a lot else you can do apart from throw insults. I have found your relentless, selfish ranting really offensive throughout and would suggest that if you don't have anything new to say then shut it rather than throw insults like a girl


I'm so pleased you really know we have a PB progressing towards completing a deal as I haven't seen one bit of progress over the last few weeks. As for your comments about insults I hope for your sake no girls read your post as you could find your comments may well have insulted them. By the way how do girls insults differ from mens ?

Re: Argyle takeover depends on separate property deal!

User avatar

Posts: 2688
Joined: 07:41 07 Dec 2006
by FordGreen
» 13:31 01 Aug 2011


There's never a handbag smiley available when you need it, is there? :lol:

Re: Argyle takeover depends on separate property deal!

avatar

by Ian Newell
» 13:33 01 Aug 2011


marin(er) wrote: your relentless, selfish ranting really offensive throughout and would suggest that if you don't have anything new to say then shut it rather than throw insults like a girl


I would imagine any female reading that, woud find that really offensive as well. :eh:

What's good for the goose.................

Re: Argyle takeover depends on separate property deal!

User avatar

Posts: 508
Joined: 20:31 02 Sep 2008
by marin(er)
» 13:40 01 Aug 2011


IJN wrote:
marin(er) wrote: your relentless, selfish ranting really offensive throughout and would suggest that if you don't have anything new to say then shut it rather than throw insults like a girl


I would imagine any female reading that, woud find that really offensive as well. :eh:

What's good for the goose.................


I happen to think he throws them rather well
Home Park is a fortress! (from today)
Topic locked
Previous 1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Next
125 posts Page 6 of 10
Return to The Story So Far

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests

  • Home
  • Fantasy Football
  • Predictions
  • Club Info
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQ

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

League Table

Fixtures

News

www.pafc.co.uk/news
Tweets by Pasoti1
twitter.com/pasoti1
Follow @pasoti1

Links

Popular Sites

  • Greens on Screen
  • Official Site
  • Argyle Superstore
  • Match Tickets
  • Argyle Community Trust
  • Home Park Development
  • Argyle Ladies

Fan Sites

  • GOS Daily Diary
  • Green Taverners
  • Argyle Fans' Trust
  • Argyle Life

Associations

  • London Branch
  • Cornish Supporters

News & Stats

  • BBC club page
  • News Now
  • Soccerbase
  • Football Ground Guide
  • The team
  • Delete all board cookies
  • All times are UTC

  • Developed by Vertical Plus Ltd | Template: ComBoot by Florian Gareis