IJN wrote:PlymptonPilgrim wrote: Fair enough Peter. I did say 'some' when referring to the members, and I wasn't thinking of you, more of Ian Newell who seems to throw his toys out when someone doesn't agree with him or he doesn't get what he wants - and then resorts to abuse.
You were referring to me Garry, well, I'd never have guessed.
Problem is, just because a person wears a suite and tie, doesn't mean I have to kowtow to the insult which he threw.
All of the CC are aware of what is needed, and once again, this man attempts to patronise those that are involved.
He's the man that has cocked up, he's the man that has not completed a meaningful due dilligence, he's the man that has allowed the passing of milestone payment after milestone payment, he's the man that has allowed deadlines to be delayed in an attempt to make his 'best bid for the creditors' nonsense to come true.
Abuse? Hell yes? Plenty of it? With lots more to come.
You deal with the loss of this club how you want, I'll deal with it the way I want, how's that for democracy.
Don't worry though, I'm sure there's plenty of time to secure your parking space these days, let's face it, when it was far more attractive, you couldn't do enough, and yet now???
As I said 'nasty'.
Plenty of Greens have come to the fore during this time, and some of whom I'd never have guessed, others have actively hidden, you're one of them, and that really didn't surprise me, as I say, not that attractive now, is it?
I rest my case.
Anyway, we're all upset and disappointed at what's taking place. But I'm sure you can hold your head up high.