greengenes wrote: The timing of Reids departure seems wrong now . IF he was in situ still at this time I expect the problem would be smaller .
gg, if he was still in post, there would be no problem in his direction........except lack of points

greengenes wrote: The timing of Reids departure seems wrong now . IF he was in situ still at this time I expect the problem would be smaller .
greengenes wrote:tonycholwell wrote:greengenes wrote: The timing of Reids departure seems wrong now . IF he was in situ still at this time I expect the problem would be smaller .
gg, if he was still in post, there would be no problem in his direction........except lack of points
I know young Tony . However we are where we are and it sucks .
The sooner the deal goes through the sooner we can bring in more players . Chickens and eggs innit ?
MylesPAFC wrote:with-menace wrote:grumps wrote: SAINT PETER the man can do no wrong![]()
how dare you the mans a selfless legend who single handedly saved our club and fed the poor,blah blah etc![]()
![]()
In all fairness, Ridsdale did save the club, without him coming in when he did I don't think we would have a club now, but that is a different topic.
pogleswoody wrote:Quintrell_Green wrote: Smells like a case of professional negligence by the administrator's legal advisors, or have I got this wrong with regard to Tony Campbell? Cannot an interested party make a claim somehow.
Now PR's position is another matter. The problem is that he is being probably advised by his own lawyer, who is not likely to advise him to concede, as that lawyer has no emotional attachment to the critical issue of PAFC's continuity.[/quote]
and why should he? can't expect a solicitor to say: 'let it go Reidy or you might upset Quintrell Grenn can you?? (can you??) reidy made enough sacrifices in his time here. not his fault if those running the club continue to make elementary mistakes or skip detail.
just goes to show you are better off with a legal adviser who gives you advice rather than one who suggests you don't answer questions truthfully!!
lunarjetman wrote: It bet they are furious that their names got leaked. Does this amount to bullying tactics by the administrator or Brent ??
What does the law say about this matter ? Could legal action be taken by TC or PR over this ?
If they sign something now, perhaps they could later argue that they were forced to sign under duress (ie threat of being attacked by nutty Argyle fans) ??
IJN wrote:chunkymonkey78 wrote: Doughnut?!
That's one of mine.
Have you not heard of a ring doughnut then?
green machine wrote: Tony, dont sign it until you are 100 percent happy, if the club folds it folds , and thats from a football creditor
Phenom wrote: No one should feel bullied into signing an agreement they aare not 100% happy with. i am posititve an agreement can be reach with Tony and peter that suits all parties.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group