cleaner wrote: IF, as rumoured, he didn't receive any wages at all,then he probably thinks he should get what he is owed.
What I find strange is that PR's issue seems to been allowed to lie until the last moment. As a high earner I would have felt the likely amount involved would have loomed large before now. Peter Ridsdale spoke regarding the amicable nature of the sacking interview with PR and how the chatted long about football generally. It looks as if the contentious issue of pay and outstanding rights were conveniently forgotten at the time and allowed to fester.