Flagman wrote: Hi Ian / J V and the rest
JV has a point about the Trust being independent. I saw the reason for Chris leaving the chair post was because he was too close to the new owner to be effective as a questioning voice.
We have been saved for that we are all truly thankful, but unlike the 'jump, how high' comment I disagree.
The trust can and should raise questions (when necessary), they should be a link between the common fan and the owners, after all we learnt what Argyle mean to so many people and so many people have also done their bit to save our club.
I definitely don't have an issue with a meeting tomorrow between the trust and JB, in fact its vital that such meetings take place. JB needs fans to get behind the club as much as possible and the people like Ian and co are just the type of fan that can galvanise our support, learn and understand how we can actively support our club.
JV is right to use this thread to air his fear about how the trust will function, that is a big part of what these boards are all about after all. But at the same time I feel we will all benefit from such a meeting.
Just my musings, ignore as you see fit.
Apart from the first paragraph that's a decent post.
To try and claim in stood down because I was too close to James Brent is a joke.
Firstly I have clearly set out why I stood down. Don't remember that reason anywhere in my post?
Secondly if you knew the pressure that the likes myself/Ian and others had put on JB throughout the process you would realise what a ridiculous comment that is.
James Brent is now the owner of Argyle and should be scrutinised like anyone else. This meeting offers us the chance to look at how to effectively do that in the short term prior to the Club stabilising.