His footballing philosophy doesn’t match the direction in which the club is trying to go on the field, so for that reason I don’t think it would be a great idea to have him involved in an official sense. If we were fighting at the bottom or if we had to make ourselves hard to beat, or if we were struggling to attract players, then yes, but we’re moving away from that now and therefore I don’t think his input would be valuable. I’ve also never been a fan of the ‘director of football’ role at the lower levels of the game, which is what I assume your referring to by a place on the board? Can often lead to power struggles and you never really know who is higher up the pecking order, the manager or the DOF. We have a manager, we have an assistant manager, we have an analyst, we have a physio and a head of fitness, and we have Dewsnip as an advisor, all are on the same page & I don’t think more voices would necessarily be beneficial when we’re trying to move in a specific direction.