I've wondered this for a while, but how many people would be OK with Argyle adopting a gambling shirt sponsor, as it seems most clubs are now doing?
I thought it was quite striking how Norwich recently went from years of sponsorship from Colmans and Norwich Union/Aviva to a company called LeoVegas. Now Ipswich have switched from club owner's company Marcus Evans to... MagicalVegas. Both LeoVegas and MagicalVegas have horribly garish logos that have made their way intact to the shirts.
I'd previously thought that a family club like Norwich wouldn't have taken that route and that Argyle would never do either, but presumably the money is too good to turn down.
These developments do make me very glad indeed to have 1) Ginsters, and 2) a logo changed specifically to suit the shirt.
I thought it was quite striking how Norwich recently went from years of sponsorship from Colmans and Norwich Union/Aviva to a company called LeoVegas. Now Ipswich have switched from club owner's company Marcus Evans to... MagicalVegas. Both LeoVegas and MagicalVegas have horribly garish logos that have made their way intact to the shirts.
I'd previously thought that a family club like Norwich wouldn't have taken that route and that Argyle would never do either, but presumably the money is too good to turn down.
These developments do make me very glad indeed to have 1) Ginsters, and 2) a logo changed specifically to suit the shirt.