

argyleforever wrote: Why were there no GoS updates of photos on sunday?
Oh, and not good news about the next set. I'm sorry to say I won't be able to publish next weekend and probably not until the following Wednesday
Ottawa Green wrote:argyleforever wrote: Why were there no GoS updates of photos on sunday?
From GOS's last postOh, and not good news about the next set. I'm sorry to say I won't be able to publish next weekend and probably not until the following Wednesday
Biggs wrote:Kentishgreen wrote: Maybe someone recognised it looked incredibly stupid having a gap where no gap should be!
Well you can always propose to rewrite the laws of mathematics so the word 'Argyle' fits as you want it.
The seating plan initially read 'Pilgrims', rightly overruled in favour of 'Argyle'... which looks totally and utterly fine and symmetrical.
demportdave wrote:Biggs wrote:Kentishgreen wrote: Maybe someone recognised it looked incredibly stupid having a gap where no gap should be!
Well you can always propose to rewrite the laws of mathematics so the word 'Argyle' fits as you want it.
The seating plan initially read 'Pilgrims', rightly overruled in favour of 'Argyle'... which looks totally and utterly fine and symmetrical.
Regarding symmetry, why do the back 4 or 5 rows of so-called Premium seats extend to the Devonport End but do not extend to the block containing the letter A at the Barn Park End?
demportdave wrote:Biggs wrote:Kentishgreen wrote: Maybe someone recognised it looked incredibly stupid having a gap where no gap should be!
Well you can always propose to rewrite the laws of mathematics so the word 'Argyle' fits as you want it.
The seating plan initially read 'Pilgrims', rightly overruled in favour of 'Argyle'... which looks totally and utterly fine and symmetrical.
Regarding symmetry, why do the back 4 or 5 rows of so-called Premium seats extend to the Devonport End but do not extend to the block containing the letter A at the Barn Park End?
metroace wrote:demportdave wrote:Biggs wrote:Kentishgreen wrote: Maybe someone recognised it looked incredibly stupid having a gap where no gap should be!
Well you can always propose to rewrite the laws of mathematics so the word 'Argyle' fits as you want it.
The seating plan initially read 'Pilgrims', rightly overruled in favour of 'Argyle'... which looks totally and utterly fine and symmetrical.
Regarding symmetry, why do the back 4 or 5 rows of so-called Premium seats extend to the Devonport End but do not extend to the block containing the letter A at the Barn Park End?
The two blocks nearest to the Devonport have got platforms at the rear Of them for our fans who are in wheelchairs.
Argyle Nutter wrote: E by gum Lad, the boy has done good aint E,
greybeard-kernow wrote:metroace wrote:demportdave wrote:Biggs wrote:Kentishgreen wrote: Maybe someone recognised it looked incredibly stupid having a gap where no gap should be!
Well you can always propose to rewrite the laws of mathematics so the word 'Argyle' fits as you want it.
The seating plan initially read 'Pilgrims', rightly overruled in favour of 'Argyle'... which looks totally and utterly fine and symmetrical.
Regarding symmetry, why do the back 4 or 5 rows of so-called Premium seats extend to the Devonport End but do not extend to the block containing the letter A at the Barn Park End?
The two blocks nearest to the Devonport have got platforms at the rear Of them for our fans who are in wheelchairs.
the few rows in front of the wheelchair stands are for disabled fans who do not use a wheelchair i believe, the ones who used to sit in the old disabled stand,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group