Balham_Green":280ertpp said:
GreenThing":280ertpp said:
Balham_Green":280ertpp said:
And if my aunt had testicles...
Excuses aren't good enough. It's blatantly obvious to most the team is not playing well. You make your own luck.we could have been 2 or 3 down before Ladapo's effort.
.... or we could have been 2 or 3 up. If your Auntie had testicles works both way.
Just a small difficulty there. We did NOT create 2 or 3 chances. Apart from that a perfectly reasonable argument! ?!
We did, though. Sawyer was getting up the wing and getting crosses in. Those were chances that we should have capitalised on. It seems that a shot off target or saved are only classed as a chance, when a cross 6ā too high is not seen as a chance, but is arguably a better chance than a long range shot.
We could have been 3 or 4 up, we could have been 4 or 5 down. Your Auntie could have balls, but your Uncle might also have nice mammaries.
The only thing that matters is that the crosses need someone on the end of them, shots need to be on target and if weāre going to insist on letting the opposition come onto us and defend inside the box, the defence have to win the headers. Thereās only a few areas which are letting us down, key areas. Get them right and thereās not really much needed to turn the tanker around.