Like many I have concerns about Sheridan. But look who assists him - the Chuckle brothers McCarthy & Wotton. Very little experience between them. He is not going to be fired so he needs more expertise to come in.
Balham_Green":2gofce9n said:Pogleswoody":2gofce9n said:Its a bit simplistic. Are you suggesting the best players in the world always 'hit the target'? If that were the case in World Cups the scores would be 7.7 or something.
No, because the world class keepers would save a certain percentage neh?? I don't mean score, I mean score if the goalie doesn't save it.
simplistic enough for you?
young green":kp4xsa7m said:Balham_Green":kp4xsa7m said:Pogleswoody":kp4xsa7m said:Its a bit simplistic. Are you suggesting the best players in the world always 'hit the target'? If that were the case in World Cups the scores would be 7.7 or something.
No, because the world class keepers would save a certain percentage neh?? I don't mean score, I mean score if the goalie doesn't save it.
simplistic enough for you?
TOO simplistic. I'll ask the question again. Do players at the highest level e.g. world Cups, always 'hit the target'? Whether the keeper saves it or not. Dont bother answering we know they dont. So if they don't at that level....
Pogleswoody":wgqu5zd9 said:young green":wgqu5zd9 said:Balham_Green":wgqu5zd9 said:Pogleswoody":wgqu5zd9 said:Its a bit simplistic. Are you suggesting the best players in the world always 'hit the target'? If that were the case in World Cups the scores would be 7.7 or something.
No, because the world class keepers would save a certain percentage neh?? I don't mean score, I mean score if the goalie doesn't save it.
simplistic enough for you?
TOO simplistic. I'll ask the question again. Do players at the highest level e.g. world Cups, always 'hit the target'? Whether the keeper saves it or not. Dont bother answering we know they dont. So if they don't at that level....
I'm with Pogleswoody. Everyone knows they don't, and a 100% rating will be rare to say the least but in the theory of it they SHOULD. No one (hopefully) shoots to miss.
Balham_Green":2sdwgzrf said:Pogleswoody":2sdwgzrf said:young green":2sdwgzrf said:Balham_Green":2sdwgzrf said:Pogleswoody":2sdwgzrf said:Its a bit simplistic. Are you suggesting the best players in the world always 'hit the target'? If that were the case in World Cups the scores would be 7.7 or something.
No, because the world class keepers would save a certain percentage neh?? I don't mean score, I mean score if the goalie doesn't save it.
simplistic enough for you?
TOO simplistic. I'll ask the question again. Do players at the highest level e.g. world Cups, always 'hit the target'? Whether the keeper saves it or not. Dont bother answering we know they dont. So if they don't at that level....
I'm with Pogleswoody. Everyone knows they don't, and a 100% rating will be rare to say the least but in the theory of it they SHOULD. No one (hopefully) shoots to miss.
Thing is posting your opinion on here sometimes is less than 'simplistic' because the pedantry level quotient is set so high (these days). NOBODY said hit the target every time (FFS!), I said we had lots of shots from open play with players taking the shot being 'open' and the vast majority didn't even trouble the keeper. I think our shots were poor and our target-hitting ratio too low for players who get paid to hit the ball.