No they let us down and didn't turn up for 80 mins of the first game and 45 mins of the second, simply not good enough for professionals.ming the merciless":2nkokl62 said:IJN":2nkokl62 said:His team are there though and now 1-0 in the lead.
All us greens are sitting at home really peed off that the team let us down.
Fans mean nothing, look at Leeds United as an example.
I wonder what they think of Bournemouth?
Not sure I agree with that bit Ian. They were just better than us, from the manager down. Doesn't hurt to dish the credit out sometimes.
bet we would not we never took that many last time so why do you think we would this time.Bedfordgreens":1cfr96vu said:Official Attendance just over 38,000. P.ss Poor or what, we would have taken that on our own !!
This...demportdave":1ea49j52 said:Good result for Argyle, Southend would have been more of a threat next season.
As well as they have done this year, having missed promotion I think Wycombe will probably now lose their best 3 or 4 players and only be a mid-table side next year.
Also, it's a better away trip from Plymouth.
Bedfordgreens":xep9yg1j said:Official Attendance just over 38,000. P.ss Poor or what, we would have taken that on our own !!
djg145":15xtefgf said:Bedfordgreens":15xtefgf said:Official Attendance just over 38,000. P.ss Poor or what, we would have taken that on our own !!
Todays game 38,252
Argyle v Darlington (old Wembley) 43,431
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_Footb ... -off_Final
Biggs":2riysgmp said:djg145":2riysgmp said:Bedfordgreens":2riysgmp said:Official Attendance just over 38,000. P.ss Poor or what, we would have taken that on our own !!
Todays game 38,252
Argyle v Darlington (old Wembley) 43,431
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_Footb ... -off_Final
That article also says we took 35k, and it's reasonable to expect we'd take more than that now.
PL2 3DQ":gx7wmll0 said:Clearly not written by an Argyle or football fan. Even by the Herald's low standards that article is poor. And calling Exeter muppets. :facepalm: