sky sports news not enough confirmation of signing.... jesus... only on pasoti eh

I meant had I missed it confirmed anywhere else, also as someone else asked is it loan or permanent, clear enough now!!

the post was aimed at admin, this should clearly be on the main forum, yet someone somewhere in the mods room is sitting getting a little bit excited at having moved this thread to rumours.

he has signed on loan as reported by sky sports, so move it back for fans to see

Well I won't be moving it back even if a link is provided, manners are not expensive.

well done

sky sports news not enough confirmation of signing.... jesus... only on pasoti eh

I meant had I missed it confirmed anywhere else, also as someone else asked is it loan or permanent, clear enough now!!

the post was aimed at admin, this should clearly be on the main forum, yet someone somewhere in the mods room is sitting getting a little bit excited at having moved this thread to rumours.

he has signed on loan as reported by sky sports, so move it back for fans to see

He has not signed yet. Source? Peter Reid, an hour ago.

sky sports news not enough confirmation of signing.... jesus... only on pasoti eh

I meant had I missed it confirmed anywhere else, also as someone else asked is it loan or permanent, clear enough now!!

the post was aimed at admin, this should clearly be on the main forum, yet someone somewhere in the mods room is sitting getting a little bit excited at having moved this thread to rumours.

he has signed on loan as reported by sky sports, so move it back for fans to see

He has not signed yet. Source? Peter Reid, an hour ago.

You expect us to beleive him over the Pasoti hierachy, he will do as he is told this Reid fella!!

P.S name dropper

sky sports news not enough confirmation of signing.... jesus... only on pasoti eh

I meant had I missed it confirmed anywhere else, also as someone else asked is it loan or permanent, clear enough now!!

the post was aimed at admin, this should clearly be on the main forum, yet someone somewhere in the mods room is sitting getting a little bit excited at having moved this thread to rumours.

he has signed on loan as reported by sky sports, so move it back for fans to see

He has not signed yet. Source? Peter Reid, an hour ago.

He has indeed signed. Source? Wikipedia

If he is a similar player to Fletch and D Johnson, then does this mean that one of them is leaving?

Wiki is stating he is now our player having signed today.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owain_Tudur_Jones

lol, who ever changed that put loan at the top and three year deal at the bottom, thats a long loan by anyones standards.

lol, who ever changed that put loan at the top and three year deal at the bottom, thats a long loan by anyones standards.

That'll do

so has he signed now then?

nothing on the OS, he isnt in the team photo either, but its on here and rumours?

sky sports news not enough confirmation of signing.... jesus... only on pasoti eh :?

I meant had I missed it confirmed anywhere else, also as someone else asked is it loan or permanent, clear enough now!!
:)

the post was aimed at admin, this should clearly be on the main forum, yet someone somewhere in the mods room is sitting getting a little bit excited at having moved this thread to rumours.

he has signed on loan as reported by sky sports, so move it back for fans to see

Still waiting for a link.

It was definitely reported on sky when I steers the thread, not heard anything since though.

He has definitely NOT signed....yet. PR said this evening that he wants to have another look at him in a more competitive game than the one one he had against Saltash but that he does rate the lad. So the signs are good.

He has definitely NOT signed....yet. PR said this evening that he wants to have another look at him in a more competitive game than the one one he had against Saltash but that he does rate the lad. So the signs are good.

Isn't there a rule that states that triallists are only allowed to play in non-competitive games for their prospective clubs? Unless PR is thinking of hastily arranging a friendly between now and Saturday afternoon, surely there's no way of having another look at him unless he signs the lad? I think I've got a .pdf of FA rules somewhere, I'll have a look.

EDIT: I think this is it. If someone here speaks legal-ese, feel free to correct me if I've got the wrong end of the stick.

Section C - Rules Relating To Players

Players with written contracts

(i) Registered Players to Play for One Club Only

(i) A Player registered with The Association can play only for the Club holding the registration unless:

(A) in the case only of benefit, testimonial and charity matches, the Player
obtains by written request special permission of The Association; or
(B) is temporarily transferred in accordance with Rule C1(g)(v); or
(C) is registered under a Scholarship in accordance with Rule C3; or
(D) has the written permission of the Club, copied to The Association, to play not more than two trial matches for another Club, provided that such matches are not for the first team of that Club in a Competition Match and are both within a period of one month from the date of such permission, which shall not be repeated in the same playing season for the same Player to the same Club.

He has definitely NOT signed....yet. PR said this evening that he wants to have another look at him in a more competitive game than the one one he had against Saltash but that he does rate the lad. So the signs are good.

Isn't there a rule that states that triallists are only allowed to play in non-competitive games for their prospective clubs? Unless PR is thinking of hastily arranging a friendly between now and Saturday afternoon, surely there's no way of having another look at him unless he signs the lad? I think I've got a .pdf of FA rules somewhere, I'll have a look.

No need to look at the rules, you are correct.

Yes, we are taking Darius Vassell on a 52 week trial just to have a wee look at him. And he can play in league and cup games