It is pretty much their last chance of salvaging their investment, so I wouldn't put anything past them.Peter_Jones":3ayjhj03 said:Stuart_C":3ayjhj03 said:I had wondered if the board could be playing a game of chicken with PCC to get their plans for Central Park through.pontypoolgreen":3ayjhj03 said:Pilgrim61":3ayjhj03 said:FACT
I understand from a very good source that AEG are still actively involved in discussions and that senior representatives have been in Plymouth and are not put off by the WC bid failing.
Philip Anschutz is mega loaded and is a known associate of Joe Plumeri.
CONJECTURE
I wonder whether this interest could extend beyond the ground? After all they are major shareholders of Hammarby IF in Sweden (who play in green and white!) who have a relatively small (15,000), modern stadium. A regional football club in England would seem to sit with their portfolio.
Let's hope you're right, stadium finished and our money problems over.
Pay the staff first though.
Their need for Ridsdale to be on board would suggest this is highly unlikely and if it was true would leave a nastier taste in the mouth that they involved peoples' livelihoods.
That's an interpretation I've heard voiced, too.
Could they be quite that cynical?
They alienated PCC who have then adopted a polarised philospohy for Central Park forgetting their orignal AAP. If the Courts give a 28 day adjournment tomorrow, both sides needed "their heads knocking together" to start talking about a compromise in line with the AAP.