It would be interesting to know when the Argyle hierarchy first started to realise things were going badly wrong with Foster at the helm. Hallett and Dewsnip have said that we sacked Foster purely because of the results, they have to say that, but I don’t buy it, we aren’t the kind of club to make knee jerk decisions because of a few defeats, there were clearly far deeper problems, did the players approach board? Did the backroom staff raise concerns? We were late in sacking Foster but being stateside it’s possible that Simon Hallett was late in being briefed as to the true extent of what had been going on.