It's just great that this project is moving forward. I don't see any reason to condemn what we don't yet know, that's pretty harsh IMO, be nice to see the layout in draft along the line,
Pete
Pete
X Isle":8e5fvegz said:I really don't get the snidey 'prawn sandwich' comment :roll:
It's as irrelevant and anachronistic class war anthem as everything that comes out of Corbyn's mouth. Sure in an ideal world it would be nice to have the ground full of 'salt of the earth' working class men with dirt on their faces and pride in their hearts. But the world has moved on, they don't exist any more.
...and they've never really existed in sufficient numbers and for a sufficient amount of time in Plymouth to fund growth anyway. If the middle classes will spend more and turn up more frequently and reliably then damn right Argyle should target them.
The notion of some sort of greater virtue in those wearing flat caps and carrying a copy of Socialist Worker is soooo out of date now. If Argyle are getting with the times then so should the class war warriors who view corporate hospitality as some sort of malevolent witchcraft.
...and no, I never have and never will use those facilities myself.
northroadwest1":1pd2ggbh said:So the roof won't cover the seats in the lower section? You cannot be serious
northroadwest1":1xy8xjqw said:So the roof won't cover the seats in the lower section? You cannot be serious
Biggs":12qoeqah said:northroadwest1":12qoeqah said:So the roof won't cover the seats in the lower section? You cannot be serious
The lower tier will be realigned. If it gets steeper, as is likely the case for better sightlines and more space for facilities behind it, then it will be more likely to be covered by the existing roof.
There seems to be a lot of jumping to conclusions when we have seen nothing, and have no specific details at all bar the promising titbits in the latest update.
HC Green":2tbvdblh said:Based on that the capacity of the lower grandstand has been reduced and additional emergency exits built there would appear to be an issue with the exits. If additional seats are being put on the old terrace this would suggest some major reconfiguration of the exits from those areas.
Unless i've been whooshed here, 'tis you that cannot be serious. Has it really been that long since the terracing and then temporary seating went away? We always got wet standing/sitting there.northroadwest1":2pzonoqe said:So the roof won't cover the seats in the lower section? You cannot be serious