MannameadGreen":39rvrift said:I know he was a great servant to the club, a hard worker and he was a decent veteran signing for a club with literally no money - and a fans' favourite because of this. I think's he's a top bloke, I'll always have a soft spot for him and I wish him the best of luck in the future.Ollieargyle9":39rvrift said:Cobi Budge.":39rvrift said:Criticise Feeney's ability all you like (I thought he was alright, link up play and passing superb), but he was a great club servant, here throughout the months of no pay and possibly the hardest worker I've ever seen play for us, top guy.
Agreed I liked him, he made a nuisance of himself in the area and as you say his link up play was very good. I would have to liked to have seen him play alongside a natural goalscorer. Playing him either up front on his own creating space for imaginary strikers or alongside Chadders who was a target man himself, also looking to support a goalscorer rather than score himself was never going to work in all honesty.
Of course he wasn't a world beater but what were we expecting for our money (or lack of it) back when Peter Reid was scraping together a team on the promise that they might be paid at some point? Hard worker, team player and a top bloke; that was exactly what we were after that summer, he came in and did the job. Its not his fault the club didn't have the money to find the goalscorer for him to support.
But last pre-season, we were a club looking for a upper-mid-table finish under an experienced manager. Feeney was a pest and a decent passer but not strong enough to hold the ball up effectively, too small to win many headers, not skilful or deft at all and was coming off the back of a campaign where he scored one goal that wasn't a penalty. One goal! I know there are centre-forwards who don't have to score regularly to be effective but one goal a season just isn't good enough.
Reid and Alessandra are hard-working pests too, but it's hardly mentioned because they're also technically gifted - unlike Warren Feeney.
I never denied the fact that Feeney wasn't a natural goalscorer in fact that was the basis for my whole argument; Feeney was never a goalscorer, his only crime was being played upfront alone or alongside another forward who wasn't known for being a natural finisher. Given a decent goalscorer alongside him I would say that he would have made a much greater impact in the final third, I wouldn't have expected him to ever score goals aplenty but I'm firmly of the belief that he would have offered us another option up front as a supporting striker through the attributes you list above: his passing game and the all round nightmare he caused opposition defenders through his pest-like qualities. Oh how Reuben may have benefited this season having someone like Feeney alongside him taking care of one or two of the three men opponents seem to put on him.
As an aside it was 3 goals in 12 starts for us last season (thanks GoS), that's about 12 goals over the course of a 46 game season (8 if we account for sub-appearances as half a start). Again neither world beating but not bad tallies if they were in addition to the goals a natural finisher would have hopefully scored alongside him.