T
Tyhee_Slim
Guest
Greenskin":35kraqq3 said:Paul_Roberts":35kraqq3 said:PJ has a different perspective because he can see the books. It must be frustrating when you're privy to information that suggests you could afford a better calibre of player if - say - only another 1,250 fans came through the gates every other week.
Argyle directors and chairmen have a long history of bemoaning Home Park attendances, and most of us would probably take the same view if we had the spreadsheets in front of us.
He would also be very aware that Argyle had a record breaking season in 2001/2 in spite of the average gates at the same stage of the season as now being about 2000 per match lower.
Don't forget though that until the new stands were opened for the boxing day game against Torquay the capacity was drastically reduced due to the building work.
Crowds at Argyle always build during a promotion season. They usually get noticeably different after Christmas, but sometimes the 'buzz' starts a little earlier, like the 74/75 season.
I often wonder though whether the legendary 'potential' of Argyle in terms of crowd sizes hasnt been somewhat skewed down the years by the fact that for a good part of our history we were rattling around in a ground that was too big for us.
I've been in 30k + crowds there a few times, and am just too young to remember the 40K capacity of the early 60s, but these crowds were very much one-offs for special occasions. I would suggest that clubs like, say, Swindon, Gillingham, Peterborough, Preston (to name just a few, with a decent geographical spread) would, given a similar capacity to the old HP, have attracted the same sort of crowds for these sorts of games, and would maybe even have had them more often. Yes, those occasional big crowds definitely demonstrate an appetite for 'big time' football in the area but, unfortunately, not - as yet - a desire to be part of the necessary growth of Argyle. You could put it down to the modern desire for instant gratification, but to be honest it's always been pretty much the same. Janners don't seem particularly interested in watching a 'work in progress'.
So, the board (and previous ones) definitely have my sympathy when it comes to winning hearts and minds, but that said I do think they are going to have to come up with a few new ideas to attract new blood and the next generation of fans.
I don't think that Peter has said anything out of order, and this is nothing compared with that rant that the board had on the 'baggo' a few seasons back, but I really dont think that criticism of potential support is the way to go here.
An idea. A few years back I was in Sorrento on holiday. The local club had just, for the first time in their history I think, been promoted to what I think was the regional Serie C. I happened to be there for the first game of the season and the ground was just behind our hotel. I managed to get a ticket (it was a sellout) and went along. A really enjoyable day, despite the football being pretty poor and the game being a 0-0 borefest, where the club managed to make it a very attractive family day out but without making it too 'Disneyfied' - it still felt like a football match. One thing the club did was send out a monthly sort of flyer/leaflet thingie which was available free of charge in virtually every shop, bar, cafe or whatever in Sorrento. This listed upcoming fixtures, details of ticket promotions, little bits of info about players etc etc. Quite a lot of adverts of course, but it was a glossy freebie about the size of a programme but only about twelve pages. It was, I suppose, a sort of modern version of the old fashioned fixture lists that used to be regularly seen in shops in Plymouth. My local butcher in Torpoint, for instance, used to have a full season fixture list plus a regular short list showing the home fixtures for the current month. I think something like the Sorrento 'flyer' would work for Argyle. Perhaps this is something that could be produced by a fans' organisation (with the club's blessing and backing) as I think it may put a slightly different slant on things. It would have to be impartial in terms of opinions about the club and off-pitch stuff of course, and maybe should restrict itself to promoting future events rather than dwelling on the past. As good as it would be to report on a winning streak, there would be times when this would not be possible, and I think such a publication has to be all about positivity and attracting people. One of the reasons I have for suggesting that fans get involved is to do with distribution as I think individual people could take responsibility for areas both within and outside the city. There's a lot of ground to cover, and local knowledge could be very important.
It's the sort of thing I would, if I lived down there, love to get involved with myself but current circumstances don't allow it unfortunately.