Rotherham match day thread

[Wexford Green]

My money would probably still be on Rotherham to win but keeping my fingers crossed

 

[StevePAFC]

Cant see us finding it as easy to beat teams with 10 men like they do with us.

 

[X Isle]

Big big test.

They’re going to sit deep now and we need to go for it whilst not leaning big holes in defence.

I’d get Miller and Wylde on

"We need to be clinical in attack and solid in defence....bring on our most wasteful forward and our weakest defender"

Hmmm, Nurse!!!, fetch the sedatives :shock:

 

[ming the merciless]

Come on Adams. Jugular please. :scarf:

 

[davie nine]

Get Fletcher on!!

 

[Wexford Green]

Oldham, Wimbledon and Bury All now losing

 

[Tugboat]

Big big test.

They’re going to sit deep now and we need to go for it whilst not leaning big holes in defence.

I’d get Miller and Wylde on

"We need to be clinical in attack and solid in defence....bring on our most wasteful forward and our weakest defender"

Hmmm, Nurse!!!, fetch the sedatives :shock:

You know very little about attacking fullbacks then.

Lamely taking face value defending and nothing more.

 

[X Isle]

Cant see us finding it as easy to beat teams with 10 men like they do with us.

This. It also towel flicks the gods of fate in the spuds with a mini 'in game' typical Argo.

With a one man advantage expectation now swings towards us. That's where we traditionally cock things up.

COYG's

 

[Biggs]

PHEW. Saw red card flash up and assumed the worst.

Come on Argyle, almost a whole half to make it count. I’d STILL be content with a draw though.

Why be content with a draw? Teams have spanked us everytime we've gone down to ten men. This is the trouble with a lot of our fan base, happy with mediocrity!!

Not happy by any stretch. Just ‘content’ with another point that I feared we might not get.

I badly want us to win, but we absolutely cannot lose now.

And I get Tuggers’ point about Miller and Wylde, the thing they do offer is width to open up Rotherham.

 

[Mark Pedlar]

Errrrr Threlkeld?

 

[Metal Green Mickey]

When we have been down to 10 men a feature was how much the opposition full backs would get forward.

Unfortunately, not sure our full backs play this type of way.

Not sure l'd regard Miller as an attacking full back after what lve witnessed of him.

 

[lipsonlad67]

456 Green Army turnout here today, pretty impressive all things considered.

 

[X Isle]

Big big test.

They’re going to sit deep now and we need to go for it whilst not leaning big holes in defence.

I’d get Miller and Wylde on

"We need to be clinical in attack and solid in defence....bring on our most wasteful forward and our weakest defender"

Hmmm, Nurse!!!, fetch the sedatives :shock:

You know very little about attacking fullbacks then.

Lamely taking face value defending and nothing more.

Erm, within those words lies the truth, I'll rearrange them.

Gary Miller defends lamely while offering nothing more :wink:

 

[Abbotts Ann Green]

Also, most of the games we went down to ten men we were already losing at that stage.

 

[Biggs]

Errrrr Threlkeld?

Forgot he was back. Or rather, Tuggers did

Agree, he would offer a better threat on the right than Sawyer OR Miller.