up_the_line":1x7i6i1z said:Andy Holland":1x7i6i1z said:I wish you were right, but I can't for the life of me see how you would be.
There's a precedent here - there's no reason to think it'd be any different.
The people of Plymouth, by and large, don't give a sh*t about their team and, sadly, probably never will. For me it's linked to a general lack of civic/local pride, but that's probably a debate for another thread.
http://european-football-statistics.co. ... b/swac.htm
So umm, I guess the people of Swansea also didn't give a poo about their team for the entire period from 1984-2005 when they averaged 4750 in the vetch field which held 12000?
You're argument is blown out of the water a little bit because there is a team who had minimal success for that period and had a lower average attendance than us. Obviously during that period the people of Swansea didn't give a poo about their team, I expect there were natives of Swansea just like you telling not to build the liberty stadium because no one in Swansea gave a poo and they never would.
Even when they reached the championship their average didn't increase above 15000 until they had a sniff of promotion
But hang on... Their average over each of the last 6 seasons has been over 20,000....but I thought they didn't give a poo??!
What a great example Swansea are UTL , should Argyle get promoted to the Championship at the end of this season , we will have a capacity of around 17,900 which would enable our club to match or better Swansea's average attendances from their last 2 seasons in the Championship which were around 15,500 . Should we then achieve the impossible of making it to the Premier League before phase 2 is complete ( which would bring our capacity to over 20,000 , i believe , not too far from Swansea's capacity of 21,500 ), then we would have to console ourselves with the something like £90,000,000 is it ?, despite not being able to accommodate the extra 4,000 or so fans for our 19 home games .