My worry about attaching it to the old grandstand is that sooner or later that thing is going to be condemned. Presumably a plaque is fairly easy to relocate at a later date though.
monkeywrench":2shxdnd7 said:IJN":2shxdnd7 said:I also had considered that as well, but anal tearing is a serious issue.
I truly hope you're not speaking from personal experience Ian?!?!
IJN":3qjlvrkp said:monkeywrench":3qjlvrkp said:IJN":3qjlvrkp said:I also had considered that as well, but anal tearing is a serious issue.
I truly hope you're not speaking from personal experience Ian?!?!
No mate, I just remember the problems that Ponty had a while back, the poor devil was in agony.
oddball":2rv60s6g said:IJN...your first statement is incorrect Gate 26 is not seen by players and directors of all teams.Away teams use the main entrance,as indeed may their directors if travelling on the away team's coach.This may mislead people into voting for it.
oddball":1mldw4tf said:Cobi...The point I am making is that away teams do not use gate 26 so they would never see the plaque.That makes statement number one incorrect.As the plaque is likely to remain in the chosen place for a number of years I think that this needs to be pointed out.
pilgrim_pete":2dzyogfw said:What about above the Players Lounge/Directors entrance?
All players and staff go through there.
oddball":1m9w6vyy said:Leigh...a plaque is meant to be read by as many people as possible to let the reader know of the fans gratitude to the players and staff.By hiding it by gate 26 it will not be read by many..As for the most prominent position that has to be above the main entrance.