Tugboat":2odo37k8 said:Hopefully just for the Liverpool game, no need for the extra expenditure to keep them for the season.
Might be needed for the Exeter game which is 4 weeks away.
Tugboat":2odo37k8 said:Hopefully just for the Liverpool game, no need for the extra expenditure to keep them for the season.
I should think the biggest expenditure is the installation. I hope they keep them.Tugboat":1pmk9lkg said:Hopefully just for the Liverpool game, no need for the extra expenditure to keep them for the season.
Verte":3otok3vx said:Forward thinking at pafc. I need to lie down
The Grumpy Loyal":3cc9eoes said:Verte":3cc9eoes said:Forward thinking at pafc. I need to lie down
I hope it happens. But let's be honest here, the phone call to start implementing this should have been made at around 3.30pm, last Sunday.
I posted on another thread last week that if Argyle are at all forward thinking, then as soon as Liverpool came out of the hat they should have been making contingency plans to maximise revenue from any potential replay. Every man and his dog knows we could sell out HomePark v Liverpool at least three times over.
If they are only just exploring the temp seat option now - 5 days later, then that is unbelievably poor.
The Grumpy Loyal":3qlm4npk said:Verte":3qlm4npk said:Forward thinking at pafc. I need to lie down
I hope it happens. But let's be honest here, the phone call to start implementing this should have been made at around 3.30pm, last Sunday.
I posted on another thread last week that if Argyle are at all forward thinking, then as soon as Liverpool came out of the hat they should have been making contingency plans to maximise revenue from any potential replay. Every man and his dog knows we could sell out HomePark v Liverpool at least three times over.
If they are only just exploring the temp seat option now - 5 days later, then that is unbelievably poor.
Stuart House":2gp7xbr3 said:The Grumpy Loyal":2gp7xbr3 said:Verte":2gp7xbr3 said:Forward thinking at pafc. I need to lie down
I hope it happens. But let's be honest here, the phone call to start implementing this should have been made at around 3.30pm, last Sunday.
I posted on another thread last week that if Argyle are at all forward thinking, then as soon as Liverpool came out of the hat they should have been making contingency plans to maximise revenue from any potential replay. Every man and his dog knows we could sell out HomePark v Liverpool at least three times over.
If they are only just exploring the temp seat option now - 5 days later, then that is unbelievably poor.
Was there any suggestion in the post that this call wasn't made on Sunday?
Quite. And like Verte says, no-one, rightly, gave us even the sniff of a chance on Sunday. There is plenty to be critical of, but not sourcing temporary seating BEFORE Sunday is just laughable as a stick to beat the club with.monkeywrench":2hqx0qlt said:The Grumpy Loyal":2hqx0qlt said:Verte":2hqx0qlt said:Forward thinking at pafc. I need to lie down
I hope it happens. But let's be honest here, the phone call to start implementing this should have been made at around 3.30pm, last Sunday.
I posted on another thread last week that if Argyle are at all forward thinking, then as soon as Liverpool came out of the hat they should have been making contingency plans to maximise revenue from any potential replay. Every man and his dog knows we could sell out HomePark v Liverpool at least three times over.
If they are only just exploring the temp seat option now - 5 days later, then that is unbelievably poor.
With respect you have no idea when Argyle started planning for this.