Home Park Development (PCC agenda 14th December 2pm)

[Ottawa Green]

Plymouth's ice arena and Home Park plans set for go-ahead

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/city-council-recommend-plymouth-argyle-882845

 

[Kevin Gollop]

Plymouth's ice arena and Home Park plans set for go-ahead

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/sport/f ... yle-882845

All sounding very positive, now let's get this thing built!

 

[PL2 3DQ]

The Local Planning Authority gives a slapped wrist to the AFT .......

The report also criticised the Argyle Fans Trust for “objecting the plans after not consulting fans who support the redevelopment” and claim “they are trying to represent their own views rather than those of all Argyle supporters.”

 

[Emeraldinho]

The Local Planning Authority gives a slapped wrist to the AFT .......

The report also criticised the Argyle Fans Trust for “objecting the plans after not consulting fans who support the redevelopment” and claim “they are trying to represent their own views rather than those of all Argyle supporters.”

:funny: :thumbup:

 

[Dalton Is God]

Also noticed this:

However, the report also raises the concerns and objections, including the issue of parking and extra traffic on Outland Road. It is also claimed that the application is in the interests of the developer and not PAFC and the City Council are urged to require that the applications are resubmitted as separate proposals by PAFC and Akkeron.

 

[The Duke]

The Local Planning Authority gives a slapped wrist to the AFT .......

The report also criticised the Argyle Fans Trust for “objecting the plans after not consulting fans who support the redevelopment” and claim “they are trying to represent their own views rather than those of all Argyle supporters.”

:funny: :thumbup:

And that’s good news?

 

[monkeywrench]

Also noticed this:

However, the report also raises the concerns and objections, including the issue of parking and extra traffic on Outland Road. It is also claimed that the application is in the interests of the developer and not PAFC and the City Council are urged to require that the applications are resubmitted as separate proposals by PAFC and Akkeron.

Yeah I think that's badly worded. I think the report is summarising the views of some of the people objecting. I don't think it's the planning dept making these comments.

Haven't read the actual report though.

 

[Andy Holland]

The Local Planning Authority gives a slapped wrist to the AFT .......

The report also criticised the Argyle Fans Trust for “objecting the plans after not consulting fans who support the redevelopment” and claim “they are trying to represent their own views rather than those of all Argyle supporters.”

...in short, exactly the reason myself and it seems many others aren't part of the Trust anymore!

 

[KFA]

For accuracy please note that both of the posts quoting extracts from the Planning Recommendation are not reporting in context. They are both extracts from representations made to PCC ie comments from the public not comments from the planners.

 

[Isondil]

KFA that makes sense...some of the comments on the AFT, reflect my submission to PCC. I didn’t think they’d use it verbatim in their report!

 

[dani B]

KFA that makes sense...some of the comments on the AFT, reflect my submission to PCC. I didn’t think they’d use it verbatim in their report!

The relevant chapter is for precisely that. Summarising the public comments

 

[NorfolkGreen]

The Local Planning Authority gives a slapped wrist to the AFT .......

The report also criticised the Argyle Fans Trust for “objecting the plans after not consulting fans who support the redevelopment” and claim “they are trying to represent their own views rather than those of all Argyle supporters.”

So they didn’t actually do this then?

 

[PL2 3DQ]

The Local Planning Authority gives a slapped wrist to the AFT .......

The report also criticised the Argyle Fans Trust for “objecting the plans after not consulting fans who support the redevelopment” and claim “they are trying to represent their own views rather than those of all Argyle supporters.”

So they didn’t actually do this then?

Out of all the public comments it was significant enough to be included in the report by the planning committee.

 

[IJN]

The Local Planning Authority gives a slapped wrist to the AFT .......

The report also criticised the Argyle Fans Trust for “objecting the plans after not consulting fans who support the redevelopment” and claim “they are trying to represent their own views rather than those of all Argyle supporters.”

So they didn’t actually do this then?

Yes they did. I know loads of fans who are peed off with a group that are supposed to reflect what the majority of fans feel, to go renegade because a noisy few objected to it.

Even though I’m not a member (any more) it still grinds my gears that any organisation with the words ‘Argyle fans’ in it, has the audacity to do it, without talking to a fair number of Argyle fans in the first place. What ‘fair’ is, is a debatable subject, but certainly the impression I have is that it was the usual babble.

 

[Mike Greening]

The Local Planning Authority gives a slapped wrist to the AFT .......

The report also criticised the Argyle Fans Trust for “objecting the plans after not consulting fans who support the redevelopment” and claim “they are trying to represent their own views rather than those of all Argyle supporters.”

So they didn’t actually do this then?

Yes they did. I know loads of fans who are peed off with a group that are supposed to reflect what the majority of fans feel, to go renegade because a noisy few objected to it.

Even though I’m not a member (any more) it still grinds my gears that any organisation with the words ‘Argyle fans’ in it, has the audacity to do it, without talking to a fair number of Argyle fans in the first place. What ‘fair’ is, is a debatable subject, but certainly the impression I have is that it was the usual babble.

A very Small minority group with an agenda. Brent haters I believe