Mike Greening":3dljj2n4 said:
It is yet another Group who confuse the meaning of representative with delegate.
-
This site is sponsored by Lang & Potter.
Home Park Development (PCC agenda 14th December 2pm)
- Thread starter IJN
- Start date
It is yet another Group who confuse the meaning of representative with delegate.
G
Greenskin
Guest
What has an internal argument between factions of an organisation got to do with the planning committee of Plymouth city council and who are they to comment on whether or not one faction or another is right or wrong in a particular instance? I'm neither a member of the trust or a supporter of Brents plan-how do they know for certain that my views represent a minority or majority of the Argyle fanbase?. Truth is they don't [neither do I] and had no business in criticising a section of Argyle supporters who put forward their own point of view-are they going to slag off groups of objectors for not consulting the opposition in every single planning proposal from now on? Would seem an absurd and rather dangerous precedence to set if so.
Visiting Plymouth yesterday for Liam Gallagher gig and The Home Park Grandstand Revamp with ice rink with be a massive boost for the city of Plymouth
Finally see our stadium complete
Well done PAFC
Finally see our stadium complete
Well done PAFC
Green skin - it is not the job of the planners to criticise or applaud any lobbyists whether pro or anti the planning proposal AND THEY HAVENT. The planning report has to fairly reflect (for the councillors to consider) the public comments submitted. So if you read the document you will find a summary of submitted comments bot for and against the planning application.
People suggesting otherwise are putting slants on the report.
I should record I am not a member of the AFT as I have concerns re their approach however I hope that once the planning issue is behind us and work underway ( and hopefully results on the pitch improved) that there can be efforts made to try and build bridges between various groups (such as the joint food bank appeal) so that we can all help move the club forward.
People suggesting otherwise are putting slants on the report.
I should record I am not a member of the AFT as I have concerns re their approach however I hope that once the planning issue is behind us and work underway ( and hopefully results on the pitch improved) that there can be efforts made to try and build bridges between various groups (such as the joint food bank appeal) so that we can all help move the club forward.
A positive step towards getting our grandstand, a very good news story in my view and hopefully means getting approval is now just a rubber stamp.
By the looks of the report it seems the AFT comment comes from a member or members of the public not the committee themselves who are of course only interested in the impact of the development itself. It was clearly deemed an important point to be included in the report itself though and the fact that it has now been published in the Herald is if nothing else a huge publicity blow for the Trust, due process is important and consultation of the membership is a basic process of a fans group. A huge lesson to learn should be taken from this.
By the looks of the report it seems the AFT comment comes from a member or members of the public not the committee themselves who are of course only interested in the impact of the development itself. It was clearly deemed an important point to be included in the report itself though and the fact that it has now been published in the Herald is if nothing else a huge publicity blow for the Trust, due process is important and consultation of the membership is a basic process of a fans group. A huge lesson to learn should be taken from this.
I know the AFT played an important role in our darkest hour but to be effective now any Fans Trust must raise funds to take a financial stake in the club and must be on the board of the football club as result. Without that the AFT is just a talking shop like Pasoti or any other fan run site or organisation you care to name. There is a role there for the fans and the Trust, it just hasn’t been taken up yet as far as I can see.
N
NorfolkGreen
Guest
PL2 3DQ":4smifffe said:
I’m not au fait with planning proces but it seems a little unfair to say the planning authority gave the AFT a slap on the wrist, when it is simply sharing comments submitted as part of the planning process.
The Duke":ul84ulqt said:
Precisely. I hope stage 1 will not be our stadium complete but stage 2 at the very least.
SwimWithTheTide":2k4e32iz said:
Yeah you're not wrong, is there any images of what the grandstand is going to look like after the first refurbishment? I've only seen images of it completed after phase two which probably won't happen for many many years if at all.
IJN":1oxyzqbg said:
Exactly. I guess it's a case of glass half empty or full. Im the latter. Otherwise I'd just end up being miserable.
