James Brent at PACSA Meeting 25th September | Page 3 | PASOTI
  • This site is sponsored by Lang & Potter.

James Brent at PACSA Meeting 25th September

May 3, 2007
2,262
0
65
Liskeard, Cornwall
tigertony":5sk3k766 said:
IJN":5sk3k766 said:
It's not rocket science is it Paul?

Those that turn up don't want to listen to question after question from people that for whatever reason can't attend.

Unless of course they're branch members who have a valid reason for non attendance.
Bit discriminatory really. No - very discriminatory actually. OK for certain people to have questions read but not OK for others. I'm absolutely certain that if this was an employer / TU meeting this type of discrimination would not happen.

Writing on my own behalf (as against a member of the PACSA Committee) does anyone really think that their questions is so flippin' special that no-one who attends will have thought of it?

If you are that desperate then perhaps you might want to organise a meeting yourself.
 

IJN

Site Owner
Nov 29, 2012
3,805
24,381
Or of course take the time and go to the meeting in Bodmin.

Come on Tone get thee from behind thy keyboard!!

See you there?
 
J

jsimmons

Guest
LG":3cspxbnl said:
Following our committee meeting on Wednesday, we'd like to make the following announcement regarding the format of the evening:-

Priority will be given to questions from the floor by those in attendance on the evening.
Written questions may be asked on the night if time allows.
Questions should be emailed to jannersjournal@tiscali.co.uk, to include the name and address of the sender.

Just to remind everyone out there! Get your questions in by 5pm tomorrow!
 
Jan 27, 2012
3,917
994
If its anything like his other meetings, everyone will be on this forum saying what a nice chap he is and what great progress is being made. And then 12 months later the club will still be languishing in the bottom division with the likes of Morecombe with no sign of any progress off the pitch.

I will start taking notice of this character once something positive happens. Until then its all talk and promises. The original (local) Stapleton board actually delivered I seem to remember.
 

IJN

Site Owner
Nov 29, 2012
3,805
24,381
Yeah they did so well didn't they? :facepalm:

Not arguing with your other point as that is your opinion and you're entitled to it.

You do tend to find though that people when meeting face to face tend to be more pleasant than from behind a screen and a keyboard.
 
May 3, 2007
2,262
0
65
Liskeard, Cornwall
IJN":3j5tuwb5 said:
Yeah they did so well didn't they? :facepalm:

Not arguing with your other point as that is your opinion and you're entitled to it.

You do tend to find though that people when meeting face to face tend to be more pleasant than from behind a screen and a keyboard.

It so happens he is a nice bloke and in any event should be treated with respect and friendliness anyway - something which is easy to forget when feeling dispirited and the laptop is open.

For me, how can reasonable development and finance ambitions be married with reasonable football ones is the issue? While the nuts and bolts of corporate finance etc of course can't be aired in a public forum, it is reasonable to expect a degree of openness - indeed this is what James Brent promised at the start of his tenure. There is a balance to be struck...

We all know how difficult the financial environment is, how can we progress on and off the pitch in that environment is my concern. Can different partnerships be made, or existing ones be re-structured, so we can make year on year footballing progress, while reasonable development ambitions are implemented in and around HHP?

In the end, if the plans for HHP development are perhaps too ambitious in the current climate, will this necessarily take the wind out of the sails of the football club or is a different way forward possible, one that could be implemented fairly quickly...?

If we can get some sense of the answers to these, even if details are sparse, then I will leave the meeting content.
 
May 3, 2007
2,262
0
65
Liskeard, Cornwall
A few notes from tonight’s meeting – anyone else who was there, please add, amend as you see fit… about 25 attendees and PACSA made a few bob too, which was nice.
Meeting was ably chaired by John Simmonds, PACSA Vice Chair.
John S opened the meeting at 7:30pm and asked James to make some intro remarks, then invited Q&A until around 9:00 pm, then a raffle.

James’s intro remarks:
1. There will be an open Fans’ meeting on 25th October and a general update and Q&A wil be held then – a bit hamstrung by what he could say today.
2. Players – new signing Bobby Reid, injuries to Reuben Reid and Peter Hartley may make them miss Saturday at Accrington but not long term problems.
3. Two major corporate announcements to be made soon – good news for the club, as follows (there was more on these issue in the Q&A).
a. Legacy position – related to balloon payments due by October 2016 due tomorrow or Monday.
b. The new stand – due over the next couple of months. JB said he was reticent to make comments that created commitments that could then not be met.
4. He was keen to reiterate his commitment to, and passion for, the club, however noting that if a better owner (one who could take the club forward more effectively and faster) emerged, he would have no qualms about handing over the reins, but he is not wanting and doesn’t expect to sell the club.
5. He also reiterated the key to success on the pitch remains financial sustainability, while the long term aim of reaching the upper leagues remains.

Q&A:
Q: With the Bretonside development, it might appear that the City Council is working against you.
JB: Bretonside is a challenge, Plymouth does not need three multiplexes – the bottom line is that he does not want conflict between PAFC and PCC.

Q: How do you feel you are doing against the previously stated three objectives (from PACSA meeting in Launceston back in 2012), relating to progress on the pitch, better facilities for fans and treating fans as customers?
JB: With our budget last year (top 7-9 in the Division) and this, (similar) we should be looking to go up. We are investing in a good squad and things are looking up. Facilities and customer issues strongly tied up with the Grandstand but improvements being made in existing facilities where possible (see for example the family area). JB drew a parallel with Swansea in terms of style (of facilities for fans and of quality of football) as aspirations for us, we need to continue to create a virtuous circle he said.

Q: When will the new stand be built.
JB: It will take nine months after construction starts but there is an asbestos removal issue that needs to be done first – making it look like nothing is being done even after Grandstand fans are moved out. We are now looking to deliver the grandstand first - bringing its phasing forward relative to other development elements and are working to achieve that. It is this phasing that will form the basis of the announcement referred to above (to be made within a couple of months).

Q: It appears that the Grandstand is drifting, that the scale of HHP development is now acting as an impediment to Grandstand progress in some ways. Are there ways to stop the “drift”, e.g. through new partnerships, better use of existing ones (esp. with PCC), and if any changes in these arrangements are made, can this give the opportunity for making the Grandstand design better?
JB: We are very much looking to simplify the Grandstand process – this is our Plan B. Investors remain very keen to fund leisure development (esp. as the bottom has fallen out of retail), so it isn’t a matter of needing to attract additional funds for the capital but of filling spaces. Simplifying the Grandstand process (and relatively fast tracking it) is the aim and it may well allow for some elements of the design to be improved. JB further noted that it is the cinema which drives the development finance.

Q: Stewarding problems in the Lyndhurst with stewards directing people away from some exits. Discussion among meeting attendees about when the happened, during and after matches.
JB: Undertook to look into the issue.

Q: Location of coach parking unsatisfactory.
JB: Undertook to look into the issue.

Q: Plymouth Albion as tenants?
JB: We have good relations with them but are not discussing this issue.

Q: Have we still got a licence for four concerts a year at HP?
JB: Yes but we are hoping HP will be a building site for a summer…

Q: How will you fund the balloon payments and what happens if you can’t? And how much is it?
JB: Can’t give you a direct answer, this is what the announcement will be about tomorrow or Monday. Very confident that payment will be made, but for info, non-payment is same as for any corporate debt. How much? At this stage, approx £1.4 to £1.6m after paying off around £2m.

Q: How do we report attendances?
JB: The standard is to report sold seats (i.e. including ST holders who do not come); PAFC applies this standard.

Q: What is your position on safe standing?
JB: If it was a (legal) option and if fans were in support, then we would do it. PAFC will support petitions for safe standing (JB noted it gives better market differentiation and so will help attendances etc).

Q: Problem of some clubs charging away fans more than home fans.
JB: Clubs are not allowed to do so – for similar accommodation, although they are allowed to do up to four (?) discounted games for home supporters per season. Argyle does not a=charge away fans more and won’t.

Q: Where do you stand on League 3 Proposal?
JB: Against. JB said he was surprised that someone as bright as Greg Dyke would come up with such an idea and thought it could never happen.

Q: Is football top heavy (PL Money).
JB: Yes and should be regulated better.

Q: Conor Hourihane. could/should we have kept him.
JB: We didn’t want him to go but he was adamant he wanted to leave and pressed very hard to do so. We negotiated hard with Barnsley (their first offer was a mere 50k) and got every penny we wanted including significant add ons.

I think there was another question but I forgot to write it down!

Errors and omissions down to me.
Cheers, Peter Ryan.
 

cheshiregreen

✅ Evergreen
Feb 17, 2004
10,644
1,576
cheshire
Thanks GR, an interesting meeting it seems.

Thought we had been promised a Grandstand announcement next month, but, seems further slippage if JB says over next couple of months......or perhaps he was being cautious.