X Isle":24unwnqa said:
One green, not multiple greens :thumbdown:
Never again should they send us out a 'mixed identity' kit like the NWO's Adidas three green abomination.
Obviously I've a strong preference for our now established and identifiable Argyle green, but, subject to a majority vote (which there's never been) I'd even rather see an pukey pale Yeovil green than a mixed green kit. Hopefully that demonstrates to those who know I'd brandish a pitchfork in defence of Argyle green JUST how abhorrent I must find mixing greens up :shock:
People dislike the word branding but it does have a very important purpose. It distinguishes us. A multiple green sends out the message that even we don't even know who we are
The idea that multiple greens shows we don't know our identity is ridiculous, it's not a completely different colour, it's merely shades. There's so much disagreement over the type of green we should wear, so why not incorperate different ones?
Even clubs like Manchester United change to different kit styles and incorporate different shades of red. Frankly it's quite boring to keep the same year on year. I agree about 'Argyle green', but I,
and many other youngsters are becoming less and less bothered with heritage. I mean, a club crest and a stadium is very different to a kit.
I, and a lot of others view Argyle as playing in green. I like the shade we have but couldn't give a squat if we changed shade, green is green though having it darker makes us a touch more identifiable.
I think we need to keep more up to date with the modern styles, move forward, make kits a bit more interesting. I pray we never have a plain green shirt again, it's just so dull.
)
