GreenSam":1gtlu993 said:Most of those clubs did acheive RELATIVE success though. Colchester, Walsall and Shrewsbury all rose to above their prrevious levels. It probably helped Oxford when you consider that one big factor against them in that they're strangled budget-wise by Kassam's extortionate rent payments.Lundan Cabbie":1gtlu993 said:spowell92":1gtlu993 said:newquaygreen":1gtlu993 said:If we had a new stand would that in itself mean more people would attend ujas the match experience would;d be better?...just a thought.
I guess if so by how many is the million dollar question
I can't find official attendances figures for Hull at Boothferry Park except the season in which the second half was played at the KC. They averaged 11,884 with half a season in the old Boothferry Park and the second half of the season played at the newly opened KC. In their first full season at the KC, in the 4th tier of English football they averaged 16,846 and 18,027 the following season in the 3rd tier; attendances have only continued to rise since, along with the club. I think, though I do stand to be corrected, that their full season average attendances at Boothferry were along the lines of 6,000.
In 2003/4 in the 4th tier Swansea City averaged 6853 at Vetch Field and 8457 the following season. They then moved into the Liberty Stadium and the average attendance was 14111. Again, like Hull we know that attendances continued to rise along with the club.
So yes there is evidence to suggest that if a club builds a new, exciting development and shows its fan-base the ambition and intent that they wish to achieve then the fans will gather to watch and support the team in doing so. Will this happen at Home Park? With the current proposals I highly doubt it, the stand is a complete step backwards on what we previously had in terms of size and your average joe fan wont be looking to regularly enjoy the corporate suites. Once the novelty of having something new has soon worn off, after people realise that our grandstand is smaller than that of Mansfield's, it'll be more dead than the current Mayflower steps.
What about Millwall, Colchester, Coventry, Shrewsbury, Walsall, Oxford, Darlington and Chester? They all invested in new stadiums too. Success isn't automatic with new builds.
The three obvious exceptions being Darlington, Coventry and Chester. And the first of those three isn't relevant because to be (proportionally) as big as Darlington's was then it would literally have to be a six figure capacity stadium. There's no comparing your Plymouth/Swansea/Cardiff type places with Darlington. Heck, there's not even any point comparing your Shrewsbury/Walsall/Milwall type places with Darlington either.
Walsall almost went bust after their new stadium was built.
The initial ground rent almost took them under, until it was renegotiated.