Penmaster":1u5rf00w said:
Gary_Wills":1u5rf00w said:
And my point being football clubs are not community assets, they don't democratically represent a population in any way, they are private small businesses offering live entertainment that's all they are. However privileged their press coverage is given the small importance in local business and society they have.
If that business wants to adapt its merchandise for its customers, so be it. But it's a rocky road pleasing one 'group' without distancing others. As this thread proves.
Not community assets? But every single club in the football league is named after the city/town/village/suburb that it is based in? How can they not be viewed as comminity assets? Why do Argyle maintain a financial commitment to being family club of the year if the club is not viewed as a community asset? Its a football club with numerous youth teams and some disability team - how can it not be viewed as a community asset?
Not all, Pm. Arsenal, Port Vale. For example.
"Maintain a financial commitment" is just waffle, but I suspect relates to some corporate responsibility equivalent, all standard business practice. As is attracting customers and potential employees at a young age as a loss leader, with those teams you mention.
If only what, say 1%, of the city's population (taking account of the non-Plymouth, Cornish brethren which flock in) regularly goes to its matches it can't claim to represent the whole community in any way can it. That would be like a Henry the Ninth declaring the official religion of England to be Jedi. Sort of.