Players have been permanently suspended for violence towards referees and this continues each year. The only way to continue the progress towards decreasing the figure is fairness both ways.
We all know how the human race react, if a referee gets away with it, the players will deem this acceptable too.
I was once in a game where a referee and a player had a fight (albeit it was a 6 a side league). The referee made antagonising comments towards the player and continued to do so. The player snapped and launched a punch. They both had a few extra swings. The referee was back the next week and the player eventually had his ban overturned 8 years later. He was banned from ALL FOOTBALL. This was fully justified.
This situation sounds no different, but the other way around. The rules must be consistent.
The below example goes against everything I’ve just said, but here’s an example from BBC Sport.
“Marcus Martin: St Austell player banned for 27 months after admitting improper conduct”
We all know how the human race react, if a referee gets away with it, the players will deem this acceptable too.
I was once in a game where a referee and a player had a fight (albeit it was a 6 a side league). The referee made antagonising comments towards the player and continued to do so. The player snapped and launched a punch. They both had a few extra swings. The referee was back the next week and the player eventually had his ban overturned 8 years later. He was banned from ALL FOOTBALL. This was fully justified.
This situation sounds no different, but the other way around. The rules must be consistent.
The below example goes against everything I’ve just said, but here’s an example from BBC Sport.
“Marcus Martin: St Austell player banned for 27 months after admitting improper conduct”