Just for fun, I've been doing some analysis of the fluctuations in league table positions for all clubs in the top four divisions. So far I have gone back 15 years (roughly half of my time supporting Argyle).
I suspect that many people would be fairly shocked to know what Argyle's average league position has been over that period (so from 2008-9 through to 2022-23) and also to see the names of the four teams immediately above and the four teams immediately below us in the 15-seasons average league table. I know that you can look at things on different timescales, perhaps going back in time to periods when Argyle were generally a higher placed team but those days are long gone, but I feel that it is instructive to get a realistic view of Argyle's footballing status in recent years and to think about what this means in terms of the types of team we are now competing with and the way that people associated with other teams, including fans, would perceive Argyle (because this is justifiably very different from how we like to see ourselves I think).
The bottom line is that we are currently competing well above the level our 15-year average level and far above those teams that are most similar to us in terms of average performance over that period (two of which are no longer in the top four divisions). Whether people like it or not we are trying to compete far above our 'natural' level. That's not defeatist or accepting mediocrity, it's fact, and I think that it is important context for the debate that is ongoing in this thread and elsewhere.