Southampton Hake":8ug127ns said:
I have had too many years of pre, half time and post match analysis from the experts on the box and restrict my watching to the action. The current crop of commentators so often fail to identify who has the ball and the drivel exchanged between them and the co-commentator is painful.
What really drove me up the wall was the post match interview with the team manager who would suggest each goal his team scored was brilliant attacking football, and every goal conceded was a defensive error.
Having lived through the ages of televised football from virtual zero live matches ( FA Cup final only) to today's saturation point familiarity has probably bred contempt.
Couldn't agree more... I've never understood why a co-commentator is needed, they often talk such rubbish, or what John Cleese used to call 'the bleeding' obvious'. Barry Davies, John Motson, David Coleman, Brian Moore etc never needed a co-commentator and they always knew all the players' names.
In the past week or so I watched one match where the commentator barely mentioned a single players name until a goal went in, and spent most of the match engaged in banal chat with his female co-commentator. And in another match, the co-commentator said 'You have to be disciplined and keep your shape when you come to a stadium like this one...' ??? WTF!!! Surely you have to do that if you play at Wembley or the local park!!!
And I wish sports journalists would think of something interesting to ask a that doesn't have a limited range of answers. For example... 'You must be pleased.. how pleased are you?' (A bit, a lot, very, not at all, extremely.... delete as appropriate!)
Rant over.. sometimes better to watch football with the volume off...