Chancellor":1z86qbrd said:PL2 3DQ":1z86qbrd said:Chancellor":1z86qbrd said:PL2 3DQ":1z86qbrd said:Wouldn't it have been more beneficial if the AFT had spoken to JB or the football club first before issuing the latest statement and already stating its position. ..
Wouldnt it have been more beneficial if Mr Brent had spoken to the AFT or other fan groups before submitting a totally unnecessary hybrid plan on the back of a fully funded project to refurb the grandstand?
He did at the Fans Forum...
Come and See
As for Tony Hopwood, it probably is the same person, as you well know, and by selling the Pavilions he did a good job because the Pavilions was costing Plymouth City Council £1.5m a year to operate and with a £30 million shortfall in its budget it was a good move for the people of Plymouth.
All operating costs transferred to Akkeron.
I didnt know that to be fair, suspected it may be. But why was my post asking this removed?
It's still there on page 2 and copied below ....
Chancellor":1z86qbrd said:As a matter of interest, is the Tony Hopwood who used to work for PCC and endorsed the £1 sale of the Pavilions and a £1m "float" to Mr Brent the same Tony Hopwood who is now in charge of this proposed development for Akkeron?
Anyone know?