True enough but that does not make us guilty does it, more evidence unknown to the Fa may well be presented by the club that proves otherwise.Lundan Cabbie":2rcjep5m said:pilgrimmike1":2rcjep5m said:If you've seen no footage LC how come you can reach a guilty on Argyle roblem: You don't now anything about the tunnel like most of us.Lundan Cabbie":2rcjep5m said:Keepitgreen":2rcjep5m said:Study the footage LC. The Argyle players were under control, trying to stop Hayes and a couple of others getting to McHugh. Not guilty guvnor.Lundan Cabbie":2rcjep5m said:The charge is failing to control players and officials. The reasons why they may have been out of control, ie the refereeing, heavy tackles or any other provocation will NOT be considered as a reasonable excuse. I fear both clubs will be found guilty.
What about the tunnel stuff though? I've not seen any footage but I was listening to Sparksy's commentary and that sounded meaty enough.
Someone official saw something for the charge to be made in the first place. It will be their statement that will be the basis of of the charges. Events were seen by someone otherwise we'd not be here where we are now. The lack of video may well be to Argyle's detriment because it might have contradicted this official's report.