Kelle Roos joins on an emergency loan (ball over the line?)

[Presto]

Just to finally clear this up.

My mate works in a Top Secret Government Agency Satellite image processing facility. He wouldn't explain why, but at the time of the incident, a Satellite was over this area and captured some images. He pulled in a few favours and has since privately confirmed that the referee and linesman signalled 'No Goal'.

Hope that helps.

Not that secret if he tells his mates where he works!

 

[Tom Cobbley]

Just to finally clear this up.

My mate works in a Top Secret Government Agency Satellite image processing facility. He wouldn't explain why, but at the time of the incident, a Satellite was over this area and captured some images. He pulled in a few favours and has since privately confirmed that the referee and linesman signalled 'No Goal'.

Hope that helps.

Not that secret if he tells his mates where he works!

Its ok he had to kill him

 

[justanotherfan]

STOP IT, STOP IT, STOP IT!!!

The Linesman didn't give a goal, the referee didn't give a goal, so it wasn't a goal.

Whether it was over the line or not is irrelevant.

Whether it was a goal is the important bit.

The linesman AND the referee say NO.

Now stop pontificating and let us all move on PLEASE?

We should all go to the naughty stair. :twisted:

 

[memory man]

STOP IT, STOP IT, STOP IT!!!

The Linesman didn't give a goal, the referee didn't give a goal, so it wasn't a goal.

Whether it was over the line or not is irrelevant.

Whether it was a goal is the important bit.

The linesman AND the referee say NO.

Now stop pontificating and let us all move on PLEASE?

Precisely! A long thread an a vote - and it is all entirely meaningless. Move on. I mean, no one ever mentions the 1966 goal in the WCF at Wembley do they!!??

 

[X Isle]

STOP IT, STOP IT, STOP IT!!!

The Linesman didn't give a goal, the referee didn't give a goal, so it wasn't a goal.

Whether it was over the line or not is irrelevant.

Whether it was a goal is the important bit.

The linesman AND the referee say NO.

Now stop pontificating and let us all move on PLEASE?

Precisely! A long thread an a vote - and it is all entirely meaningless. Move on. I mean, no one ever mentions the 1966 goal in the WCF at Wembley do they!!??

Luckily the top secret Russian government agency satellite image processing facility was on top of things that day. Combined with a highly experimental prototype thought transference device they were able to give the Russian linesman an almost instant decision...and England won the world cup.

True story that.

PS - I wish folk would stop "pontificating" that other folk should "move on", that this discussion is "meaningless, pointless and irrelevant". This is an internet message board. If meaningless, pointless and irrelevant discussion were to stop there would be virtually nothing left to read Jimsing.... you'd outlaw the word association thread with that kind of Stazi jackboot censorship.

If the good burgers of PASOTI see fit to also make this thread 2000+ pages long with successive "oh no it wasn't" and "oh yes it was" posts then so be it. I like that sort of reactionary civil disobedience in the face of being told to "move on" :lol:

 

[Keepitgreen]

STOP IT, STOP IT, STOP IT!!!

The Linesman didn't give a goal, the referee didn't give a goal, so it wasn't a goal.

Whether it was over the line or not is irrelevant.

Whether it was a goal is the important bit.

The linesman AND the referee say NO.

Now stop pontificating and let us all move on PLEASE?

Precisely! A long thread an a vote - and it is all entirely meaningless. Move on. I mean, no one ever mentions the 1966 goal in the WCF at Wembley do they!!??

Luckily the top secret Russian government agency satellite image processing facility was on top of things that day. Combined with a highly experimental prototype thought transference device they were able to give the Russian linesman an almost instant decision...and England won the world cup.

True story that.

PS - I wish folk would stop "pontificating" that other folk should "move on", that this discussion is "meaningless, pointless and irrelevant". This is an internet message board. If meaningless, pointless and irrelevant discussion were to stop there would be virtually nothing left to read Jimsing.... you'd outlaw the word association thread with that kind of Stazi jackboot censorship.

If the good burgers of PASOTI see fit to also make this thread 2000+ pages long with successive "oh no it wasn't" and "oh yes it was" posts then so be it. I like that sort of reactionary civil disobedience in the face of being told to "move on" :lol:

Quite apt for the panto season.

 

[X Isle]

...oh no it isn't.

 

[Guiri Green]

Just to finally clear this up.

My mate works in a Top Secret Government Agency Satellite image processing facility. He wouldn't explain why, but at the time of the incident, a Satellite was over this area and captured some images. He pulled in a few favours and has since privately confirmed that the referee and linesman signalled 'No Goal'.

Hope that helps.

Not that secret if he tells his mates where he works!

Its ok he had to kill him

I also have Top Secret clearance.

 

[X Isle]

Just to finally clear this up.

My mate works in a Top Secret Government Agency Satellite image processing facility. He wouldn't explain why, but at the time of the incident, a Satellite was over this area and captured some images. He pulled in a few favours and has since privately confirmed that the referee and linesman signalled 'No Goal'.

Hope that helps.

Not that secret if he tells his mates where he works!

Its ok he had to kill him

I also have Top Secret clearance.

Well done, in defending your mate from breaching the official secrets act you have condemned yourself

 

[Pogleswoody]

Anyone else read Graham Greene's sequel to The Third Man?
Called The Fourth Official ... cracking read!!

 

[justanotherfan]

STOP IT, STOP IT, STOP IT!!!

The Linesman didn't give a goal, the referee didn't give a goal, so it wasn't a goal.

Whether it was over the line or not is irrelevant.

Whether it was a goal is the important bit.

The linesman AND the referee say NO.

Now stop pontificating and let us all move on PLEASE?

Precisely! A long thread an a vote - and it is all entirely meaningless. Move on. I mean, no one ever mentions the 1966 goal in the WCF at Wembley do they!!??

Luckily the top secret Russian government agency satellite image processing facility was on top of things that day. Combined with a highly experimental prototype thought transference device they were able to give the Russian linesman an almost instant decision...and England won the world cup.

True story that.

PS - I wish folk would stop "pontificating" that other folk should "move on", that this discussion is "meaningless, pointless and irrelevant". This is an internet message board. If meaningless, pointless and irrelevant discussion were to stop there would be virtually nothing left to read Jimsing.... you'd outlaw the word association thread with that kind of Stazi jackboot censorship.

If the good burgers of PASOTI see fit to also make this thread 2000+ pages long with successive "oh no it wasn't" and "oh yes it was" posts then so be it. I like that sort of reactionary civil disobedience in the face of being told to "move on" :lol:

This, all day long LOL.

 

[Guiri Green]

Just to finally clear this up.

My mate works in a Top Secret Government Agency Satellite image processing facility. He wouldn't explain why, but at the time of the incident, a Satellite was over this area and captured some images. He pulled in a few favours and has since privately confirmed that the referee and linesman signalled 'No Goal'.

Hope that helps.

Not that secret if he tells his mates where he works!

Its ok he had to kill him

I also have Top Secret clearance.

Well done, in defending your mate from breaching the official secrets act you have condemned yourself

It's OK, I haven't used my real name.

 

[Football-Oranje]

Hi everyone,

I'm Michael, I write for Football-Oranje.com - a Dutch football website in the English language.

We interview footballers on our YouTube channel and our next player is set to be Kelle Roos.

We would like to invite anyone reading this to send us your fan questions for us to ask Kelle.

Please fire away and the best ones will be asked to Kelle this week!

Thanks all.

PS If a moderator follows us on Twitter it would be great to link up on there for further communication with your followers.

 

[janner67]

12 pages, seriously?!
..... The decision has been made, let's get on with our lives.

 

[X Isle]

12 pages, seriously?!
..... The decision has been made, let's get on with our lives.

No.