-
This site is sponsored by Lang & Potter.
C
Cobi Budge.
Guest
I thought Lee had a neat and tidy first half, but I thought he was awful in the second period.
One thing's for sure though, he gave it everything, was really impressed with his work rate, even though he was a little overenthusiastic at times which contributed to him being a tad flustered.
One thing's for sure though, he gave it everything, was really impressed with his work rate, even though he was a little overenthusiastic at times which contributed to him being a tad flustered.
Lee's loan ends after the Exeter game, do we extend it?
He does offer a goal threat but plays further forward which leaves us exposed in midfield and due to fitness issues can't last the full 90 minutes.
I do like him but I reckon Blizzard or even Norburn could do the same job. I suppose Sheridan will extend his loan because Lee is part of a winning team and provides cover for injuries.
He does offer a goal threat but plays further forward which leaves us exposed in midfield and due to fitness issues can't last the full 90 minutes.
I do like him but I reckon Blizzard or even Norburn could do the same job. I suppose Sheridan will extend his loan because Lee is part of a winning team and provides cover for injuries.
PL2 3DQ":34zsydiz said:
We definitely need a second CM (after BR) to provide a goal threat particularly with RR off colour. Whilst they have other attributes, Blizzard and Norburn along with O'Connor and Cox, offer negligible goal threat. I'd keep Lee unless Sheridan has someone else up his sleeve. After Exeter he will be able to borrow a player who would potentially be able to stay up to, and including, the play-off final.
C
Cobi Budge.
Guest
Lee had a good game yesterday but I'd still rather have Norburn, just see him as a more rounded player, while Lee is an attacking threat, his immobility and lack of concentration can often leave us exposed and give O'Connor too much to do.
Mystery to me why Norburn doesn't get more game time, he's done nothing but impress me when I've seen him play.
Mystery to me why Norburn doesn't get more game time, he's done nothing but impress me when I've seen him play.
I would keep him too. He is keen to stay and is enjoying his time with us. Very unfortunate not to scre yesterday, but is an additional goal threat at a time when we are not scoring so freely.
He's a keeper for me, so much more of a goal threat from midfield than Norburn, Blizzard or Cox.
I think we should definitely extend his loan as he is getting better with each game and getting his match sharpness to the required level.
He has had more strikes at goal than Cox or Norburn combined. Some have been poor but a good deal well saved. He adds something going forward and has improved game on game. I'd keep.
It's a conundrum. Lee was until he was replaced our main goal threat on Saturday but when Cox came on and we went to 21 in midfield instead of a 12 it freed our most creative player (Bobby Reid) from his defensive duties and he had a huge part in both the goals. It was a similar story against Accrington without the goals, Reid was far more effective when Cox came on in that game. I hope that's how we start on Saturday.
