1985nhangingon":2jll3ae2 said:UnrealFrank_Butcher":2jll3ae2 said:One dimensional impact sub.
No, really.
1985nhangingon":2jll3ae2 said:UnrealFrank_Butcher":2jll3ae2 said:One dimensional impact sub.
Exactly. We are generally a solid enough team but like the manager we are very dour. Thomas injects some life and excitement, gave the vast majority of fans a real lift on a lifeless display. As for those bemoaning his tracking back I thought he did ok, more encouraged by the excitement to add some much needed entertainment at HP.1985nhangingon":1h7quavo said:It was great to see 45mins of a proper wide player getting quality crosses in,this is what football is all about
I know but the general performance wasn't great and after Weds defeat the atmosphere was poor. A win is a win but felt a fairly hollow victory.PAFC94":1pr3812v said:Deacster":1pr3812v said:A rare spark of excitement on a dour day.
We did win...
memory man":sgyn699x said:"For every good cross there's a very poor one". Par for the course for most League 2 wingers?Paven":sgyn699x said:Frank_Butcher":sgyn699x said:One dimensional impact sub.
Pretty much. For every good cross, there's a very poor one. For every decent pass, there's on that doesn't make it's target.
He was alright, but not the Christiano Ronaldo some seem to be making him out to be.
Decent impact sub, but should be that at most IMO.
tonycholwell":1inx1kpl said:memory man":1inx1kpl said:"For every good cross there's a very poor one". Par for the course for most League 2 wingers?Paven":1inx1kpl said:Frank_Butcher":1inx1kpl said:One dimensional impact sub.
Pretty much. For every good cross, there's a very poor one. For every decent pass, there's on that doesn't make it's target.
He was alright, but not the Christiano Ronaldo some seem to be making him out to be.
Decent impact sub, but should be that at most IMO.
I'm not sure it's even true!
He created space in the first place and the crosses were varied, some high to central box, others, low with pace to the near post. And he took his goal well, very well.
Start him for 3 reasons:Verte":3gh0yc3m said:Thing is if he exposes us defensively then he is a liability. Even Eden Hazard at Chelski gets rollockings for not covering his full back.
It is a conundrum. Do you go for it and expose your flank? or play it tight and bring him on with 30mins to go to ransack tiring defenders?