up_the_line":3o3juxoc said:
saffronwalden green":3o3juxoc said:
Probably a naive question from someone who didn’t watch the game, and apologies if already mentioned, but. How can a game be lost when Argyle has so much of the possession?
Because it was backwards and sideways possession in front of Northampton with virtually no idea how to create an actual opening.
It was almost disrespectful, as if we just needed to show how many times we could pass across the back and Northampton would stand aside and applaud us on our way to goal
We don't have anybody comfortable playing in the "10" space. Mayor and Camara both like to pick the ball up deep and travel. Hardie likes to go in behind. Jephcott should be dropping in really, but it's not his strong suit. It means our passing ends up like a horseshoe. It was the same against Rochdale. We struggle when up against teams who just sit there and let us attack them.
The obvious solution in games like this would be to play four at the back and put an extra midfielder in behind the strikers. George Cooper probably the most naturally suited but currently unavailable. Maybe Reeves could do it, but his performances when he has played have been pretty bang average. However, we don't tend to stray from the 3-5-2, so we're unlikely to see it.
In terms of the criticism of 'safe possession'. I'm quite happy to watch an Argyle team dominate possession. At least if we have the ball we have less defending to do. More often than not dominating possession will lead to us scoring more and conceding less. However, we're not the finished article. We are a mid-table side and sometimes we're going to have bad days and bad results like last night.
I think everyone collectively agrees that we're good enough to stay up but too inconsistent and lacking in quality to sneak into the playoffs. Before the season started all of us would have been pleased with a mid-table finish. So I'm not sure there's much value in getting overly frustrated every-time we have a bad result.