Green_Flash":34zy2x5p said:
Brent has obviously worked out that year after year Adams over delivers on a limited budget. Offering a 5 year contract (which Adams would not get with a bigger club) is a great way to keep him.
It's a way of keeping him, hey hunky dory, but all good, not sure.
DA's a little different, and that's brilliant. He can wind up oppo with irrational pre or post match analysis to suit whatever the motivation might be to retain or gain player motivation, that's good prep, one would have to be a might smarter than he to conjure those non sequiturs on the spot, that's thought out well and long before.
Tactful. End of season he didn't whine too much about a small squad not giving enough cover, which I'm pretty sure he predicted with his let's see what's happening at forty games reference. And Brent will like tactful, discretion, all that stuff, given the journey back for Argyle to clean health.
But I greatly admire how Brent seems insistent that sports players don't need multi-season contracts to produce a decent performance that upcoming weekend, equally though, do managers need them? We've now seen some of the stars have longer contracts like Carey. And Wylde!! Now the manager's getting an even longer one. Seems the camel's nose just can't be kept out. Market pressure maybe. Sticking to principles could mean losing good people. No clean win here then.