Zak Vyner signs on loan - confirmed

[Biggs]

What’s so funny about them being consecutive posts. Ever think about checking times of posts to see if someone’s typing as someone else is posting.

You what?

I simply found the contrast funny, that's all...

'There's no way he's a replacement' followed by 'wouldn't surprise me if he was a replacement' tickled me.

 

[Ade the green]

Yeah, it’s almost like Adams doesn’t have a clue.

You're still saying that?

Seriously?

:facepalm:

Yes, i’m still saying it and i’ll keep thinking it until I see a or some forwards being signed.

Who the hell do you think you are to doubt that what I say I mean. Are you really happy about having one striker on the books. :facepalm: see, I can do it as well.

 

[lyndhurst green]

Yeah, it’s almost like Adams doesn’t have a clue.

You're still saying that?

Seriously?

:facepalm:

Yes, i’m still saying it and i’ll keep thinking it until I see a or some forwards being signed.

Who the hell do you think you are to doubt that what I say I mean. Are you really happy about having one striker on the books. :facepalm: see, I can do it as well.

Ade, seriously. There is genuinely no need to be so consistently combative.

 

[monkeywrench]

Yeah, it’s almost like Adams doesn’t have a clue.

You're still saying that?

Seriously?

:facepalm:

Yes, i’m still saying it and i’ll keep thinking it until I see a or some forwards being signed.

Who the hell do you think you are to doubt that what I say I mean. Are you really happy about having one striker on the books. :facepalm: see, I can do it as well.

Ade, seriously. There is genuinely no need to be so consistently combative.

Indeed. He's also making himself sound a bit silly.

 

[Devon General]

Asked a Bristol City pal of mine about the player. He says he has a fair amount of pace, is physically quite strong and keeps the ball well.

His favoured position is right back but can play centre back.
Not quite good enough yet for the championship but has great potential to play at a higher level.

He reckons it will turn out to be a good move for both clubs if it happens.

 

[Ade the green]

Yeah, it’s almost like Adams doesn’t have a clue.

You're still saying that?

Seriously?

:facepalm:

Yes, i’m still saying it and i’ll keep thinking it until I see a or some forwards being signed.

Who the hell do you think you are to doubt that what I say I mean. Are you really happy about having one striker on the books. :facepalm: see, I can do it as well.

Ade, seriously. There is genuinely no need to be so consistently combative.

There seems to be seeing as I am constantly being attacked for my view but my view Is about issues which are never addressed. They will never be addressed until Adams stops dicking around recruiting players in areas where we’ve had an abundance and ignoring our strike force and even worse, getting rid of whatever (poor I grant you) strikers we have.

As examples by the facepalm by Biggs because I dare to still feel miffed about Adams lack of achievement in covering for his errors previously. But no mention as to why anyone can be happy with the status quo other than “in Adams we trust”. Well I don’t.

 

[Ade the green]

Yeah, it’s almost like Adams doesn’t have a clue.

You're still saying that?

Seriously?

:facepalm:

Yes, i’m still saying it and i’ll keep thinking it until I see a or some forwards being signed.

Who the hell do you think you are to doubt that what I say I mean. Are you really happy about having one striker on the books. :facepalm: see, I can do it as well.

Ade, seriously. There is genuinely no need to be so consistently combative.

Indeed. He's also making himself sound a bit silly.

So where’s our strikers?

 

[lyndhurst green]

Yeah, it’s almost like Adams doesn’t have a clue.

You're still saying that?

Seriously?

:facepalm:

Yes, i’m still saying it and i’ll keep thinking it until I see a or some forwards being signed.

Who the hell do you think you are to doubt that what I say I mean. Are you really happy about having one striker on the books. :facepalm: see, I can do it as well.

Ade, seriously. There is genuinely no need to be so consistently combative.

There seems to be seeing as I am constantly being attacked for my view but my view Is about issues which are never addressed. They will never be addressed until Adams stops dicking around recruiting players in areas where we’ve had an abundance and ignoring our strike force and even worse, getting rid of whatever (poor I grant you) strikers we have.

As examples by the facepalm by Biggs because I dare to still feel miffed about Adams lack of achievement in covering for his errors previously. But no mention as to why anyone can be happy with the status quo other than “in Adams we trust”. Well I don’t.

You were seriously offended and attacked by an emoji?

To your point, of course we don’t have enough strikers right now. This is obvious. And of course more will be coming in. You know we haven’t lost in 8 games, yes? Whilst playing with one striker.

 

[Ade the green]

Yeah, it’s almost like Adams doesn’t have a clue.

You're still saying that?

Seriously?

:facepalm:

Yes, i’m still saying it and i’ll keep thinking it until I see a or some forwards being signed.

Who the hell do you think you are to doubt that what I say I mean. Are you really happy about having one striker on the books. :facepalm: see, I can do it as well.

Ade, seriously. There is genuinely no need to be so consistently combative.

There seems to be seeing as I am constantly being attacked for my view but my view Is about issues which are never addressed. They will never be addressed until Adams stops dicking around recruiting players in areas where we’ve had an abundance and ignoring our strike force and even worse, getting rid of whatever (poor I grant you) strikers we have.

As examples by the facepalm by Biggs because I dare to still feel miffed about Adams lack of achievement in covering for his errors previously. But no mention as to why anyone can be happy with the status quo other than “in Adams we trust”. Well I don’t.

You were seriously offended and attacked by an emoji?

To your point, of course we don’t have enough strikers right now. This is obvious. And of course more will be coming in. You know we haven’t lost in 8 games, yes? Whilst playing with one striker.

There is no of course others will be coming in until they come in. Do you forget why we ended up with Ciftci?

And no, are we really unbeaten in 8? :facepalm:

 

[Army green]

im Pretty sure derek isn’t “dicking around” he will be just as frustrated as us, even more so in fact. He has to try and find a striker that is going to add value to his squad within the half arsed budget he’s been given.

 

[Ade the green]

im Pretty sure derek isn’t “dicking around” he will be just as frustrated as us, even more so in fact. He has to try and find a striker that is going to add value to his squad within the half arsed budget he’s been given.

My point being is that he’s managed to add a defender to his squad (if reports are to be believed) and apparently wants to add a midfield plAyer to an already full quota but he’s still not (since August) rectified his lack of strikers. How about some of you answering that instead of just berating me.

 

[phil thefluter24]

Trouble is Ade some on this site only read what they want to see, bit like selective hearing

 

[lyndhurst green]

im Pretty sure derek isn’t “dicking around” he will be just as frustrated as us, even more so in fact. He has to try and find a striker that is going to add value to his squad within the half arsed budget he’s been given.

My point being is that he’s managed to add a defender to his squad (if reports are to be believed) and apparently wants to add a midfield plAyer to an already full quota but he’s still not (since August) rectified his lack of strikers. How about some of you answering that instead of just berating me.

You seriously don’t trust him to not leave the squad with only one striker for the rest of the season. Give the man some credit. And nobody is berating you, just disagreeing. Your reaction to this is consistently overly combative and argumentative. Just find it necessary.

 

[Pogleswoody]

Trouble is Ade some on this site only read what they want to see, bit like selective hearing

Yes indeed, I'm reading a thread about a young defender possibly on loan from Brizzle.
I would presume that a 'We ain't signed no strikers, we ain't' would be a separate thread that I could read or not read at my leisure!

 

[ealinggreen]

Very odd signing,welcome aboard.