James Brent???

[Bermudian Green]

We will recieve 12.5% of the pot once all expenses have been taken out not including the tv money which goes to the FA. Not a lot I grant you but it's still a bit of unbudgeted income and as they say, every little helps.

It shouldn't be unbudgeted income though, as we knew we would get something, just not exactly how much. It might be less than we budgeted for even

 

[pilgrimmike1]

We will recieve 12.5% of the pot once all expenses have been taken out not including the tv money which goes to the FA. Not a lot I grant you but it's still a bit of unbudgeted income and as they say, every little helps.

It shouldn't be unbudgeted income though, as we knew we would get something, just not exactly how much. It might be less than we budgeted for even

Budgets are set at the begining of the season and therefore play off bonuses could not be included, unless the budget was set by Mystic Meg. :scarf:

 

[FordGreen]

Unfortunately, it could be that the Chairman sees this season as a huge success financially, particularly with the income from the playoffs, so his vision of things may be entirely different from that of the supporters.

I understood that most of the pot for the two play-off matches went, not to the clubs involved, but the F.A. and that because of this, we would be lucky if we broke even?

We will recieve 12.5% of the pot once all expenses have been taken out not including the tv money which goes to the FA. Not a lot I grant you but it's still a bit of unbudgeted income and as they say, every little helps.

Bit of a bugger though when Argyle put so much of that pot money IN.

 

[pilgrimmike1]

Unfortunately, it could be that the Chairman sees this season as a huge success financially, particularly with the income from the playoffs, so his vision of things may be entirely different from that of the supporters.

I understood that most of the pot for the two play-off matches went, not to the clubs involved, but the F.A. and that because of this, we would be lucky if we broke even?

We will recieve 12.5% of the pot once all expenses have been taken out not including the tv money which goes to the FA. Not a lot I grant you but it's still a bit of unbudgeted income and as they say, every little helps.

Bit of a bugger though when Argyle put so much of that pot money IN.

There's the rub and as far as we are concerned it hardly seems fair but thems the rules.

 

[Bermudian Green]

Budgets are set at the begining of the season and therefore play off bonuses could not be included, unless the budget was set by Mystic Meg. :scarf:

Ahh, but Sheridan did say that his minimum was the play-offs, so it should have been budgeted for

My apologies though, for some reason I thought the play-off pot was being shared between the entire division, not just the 4 competing teams. It's been a long week.

 

[pilgrimmike1]

Budgets are set at the begining of the season and therefore play off bonuses could not be included, unless the budget was set by Mystic Meg. :scarf:

Ahh, but Sheridan did say that his minimum was the play-offs, so it should have been budgeted for

My apologies though, for some reason I thought the play-off pot was being shared between the entire division, not just the 4 competing teams. It's been a long week.

Just pleased it's not Sheridan that sets the budget then roblem:

 

[memory man]

any chance the (owner) may come out with some sort of statement regarding the direction the club will take or is that too much to expect.

Your view earlier was "why would we have to pay brent owns the club tough sh1te if he aint got the money". I suppose the owner could say that he owns the club and if anyone is waiting for a statement regarding the direction the club will take then it is "tough sh1te" because he doesn't have to make such a statement.

 

[jumpersforgoalposts]

I can guarantee that the chairman will be aiming for a top three place next season. How is he going to get us there? Let's just calm down and wait and see.........

 

[Deacster]

Sounds to me like Brent is pleased with Sheridan, there's only one way he's leaving and that's if he resigns, which he won't do unless he has another opportunity elsewhere. It's all very disappointing and uncontrolled - cue another season of sidelining promising youngsters, poor tactics and a revolving door of loan signings. Ultimately I'm sure we will fall short yet again and by the looks of it repetitive mistakes arnt just exclusive to the dugout, but evident in the boardroom also.

 

[pafcstafford]

Will people saying young players aren't given a chance please look at the age of this seasons squad

 

[Deacster]

Will people saying young players aren't given a chance please look at the age of this seasons squad

Apart from Nelson, Mellor and McHugh being OUR players under 23, no-one else has been given any decent run in the team. Your point is?

 

[pafcstafford]

O Connor, brunt, banton, purrington had plenty last season and you cant just discount others who have been given a chance just because they havent held down a place. Nobody has the right to play including those young with three correct birth certificate.

 

[jbeale1986]

Season 1: 21st - Season 2: 21st - Season 3: 10th - Season 4: 7th SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. IMPROVEMENTS!!!

Lets see how we get on next season under Sheridan. Then if we finish off worse, he's a goner for sure. If we get promoted then JB may renew JS contract

But for now, cant we all just back him and JB ??

 

[FordGreen]

Sorry, nope.

 

[gracie11]

With all the talk about budgets and where James is taking the club, have a look at the info given if you google him.
Doesn't fill me with confidence! (buy i'm not a money expert)

Director Summary
Director Overview
James Brent holds 22 appointments at 22 active companies, has resigned from 3 companies and held 2 appointments at 2 dissolved companies. James began their first appointment at the age of 42. Their longest current appointment spans 6 years and 10 months at AKKERON GROUP LLP.

The combined cash at bank value for all businesses where James holds a current appointment equals £2,858,636, with a combined total current assets value of £20,683,310 and total current liabilities of £36,560,425. :shocked:
Roles associated with James Brent within the recorded businesses include: Director, Llp Designated Member