WoodsyGreen":wwbryg8z said:sverigegreen":wwbryg8z said:There can really never be any outright winners in this dark green light green debate. As the fanbase appears to be 50/50 on it.
Not according to the poll on this thread.
Soccer AM - back when people used to watch it - used to do a list of banned subjects guests weren't allowed to talk about because they were so dull. If Pasoti did similar then the shade of green we wear would be No.1 on the list, closely followed by Danny Mayor's lack of end product.
Write to the club or start a petition. Otherwise give it a rest until next summer for the love of God!
Firstly and most obviously, if you think it's a dull subject, constantly posting on the thread and bringing it to people's attention at the top of the website is a really bad tactic compared to just doing something else with your life.
Secondly, it's mildly amusing/ironic that people are so desperate to police this topic of conversation (at a time when there's virtually no other Argyle related news to dissect!) given that it's one of the few things discussed on here where forum members views are relevant and informative.
Unlike the threads on on Ryan Lowe's tactics or Neil Dewsnip's transfer targets that comprise 99% of pasoti content (a fun diversion that I enjoy as much as anyone), fans opinions on Argyle's identity and whether we play in a visibly green kit or a mud-coloured one actually matter. The poll on which shade of green people like best is essentially free market research for Argyle.
Far from 'giving it a rest' to appease one or two censurious individuals who have decided that because they don't have strong opinions on the topic, no-one else should either, we should be trying to involve as many people in this discussion as possible.