Kevin_Dacombe":2n5bnol5 said:
X Isle":2n5bnol5 said:
"British racing green 'branding' "- a translation for the hard of stubborn.....
Argyle green. The colour by which the club has been identified by since the turn of the century. Encompassing most, if not all, of the waking consciousness of anyone under 25 (i.e. the growing section of support, distinct from the dinosaurs, namely those closer to extinction).
Since 1886.....14 years of "tradition".
We only ever are what we are recognised as being.
Ian bandies around 'branding' like it's a dirty word. It's usually accompanied by 'London' with reference to
the group in the most successful board in Argyle's history who were based in the capital. T'was they who introduced the darker shade, heralding our most successful period (boo hiss eh :roll: )I've always found the use of the word/s as snidey and not a little 'yokel' in it's sneering dismissiveness of any 'witchcraft' from 'them up country'.
It made us distinctive, it made us identifiable. Even more so now Yeovil have emerged. British Racing Green (as it's equally [perversely] negatively referred to) is associated with British excellence, the spitfire, the Mini and the Landy.
So yes, it's 'only been' 14 years, so what? It's what we're now associated with, it's all a growing proportion of the fanbase knows.
Branding isn't a dirty word, it's not witchcraft from furriners up London village :roll: It's there to create a distinct brand identity, which we have.
All been done to death before so it's a tangent we don't need to go down because it'll never be resolved. I just couldn't sit on my hands while Ian opened up another of his cans of 'yokel brew' and started shaking his fist at those pesky metal birds again.
There are two sides to every argumentand my flip side of 'branding bad/flipping shades willy-nilly good' is that a unique brand identity in the modern world is priceless, we toss it away to keep a few old crusties happy at our peril.
Nuff said.